2026-01-12 20:43:08

Writing smart contracts with TypeScript is still quite interesting. Recently, I teamed up with Claude Code to work on a new project. The core selling point is that there are no type checking errors throughout the process, fully adhering to TypeScript's syntax standards.

It now covers the vast majority of core Solidity modules, with roughly 132 features supported almost entirely, including a complete mapping of the EVM instruction set. This way, when developing smart contracts, you can enjoy TypeScript's full type system and developer toolchain, eliminating many of Solidity's inflexibilities and significantly improving the development experience. For friends interested in getting started or deepening their smart contract development skills, this approach is still worth considering.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractCollector

· 01-14 07:35

TS writing contracts is truly amazing; I didn't expect it to cover all 132 features. Hurry up and give it a try, so you don't have to be tortured by Solidity's pitfalls every day. With the TypeScript toolchain support, the development experience is taking off. But could this be just a transitional solution again? Finally, someone has made this happen. I've been waiting for a long time.

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 01-14 05:03

Haha, finally someone has figured out TS and smart contracts. Skipping the pitfalls of Solidity is really satisfying.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 01-12 21:13

Well, this feels great. Solidity's syntax is indeed annoying, and finally there's a comfortable alternative.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-12 21:12

132 features? Haha, the numbers look good, but the real question is who will bear the contract vulnerabilities hidden within the type system? Can wrapping a smart contract with TypeScript solve Solidity's problems? I want to see if that mapping really covers all the bytecode traps. Claude Code's collaboration... How can anyone audit the black-box logic at the compilation layer, and who can guarantee that no on-chain footprints of fund flows are hidden?

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-12 21:01

Well, now I can finally write contracts using TypeScript. Solidity is really anti-human.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFatigue

· 01-12 20:57

Bro, are all 132 features really supported? Or is it just marketing numbers again... Writing contracts in TS is indeed comfortable, but can the EVM stuff be fully mapped? I have a feeling there might be pitfalls. Claude Code works really well together, but I don't know if it's safe and secure in actual operation. If this really works, Solidity might face a big impact. I'm a bit excited. It seems like there's another learning curve to deal with, I'm already exhausted... The hype is a bit intense, let's wait until I actually use it before making any judgments. For now, just observing. A complete type system is really tempting, but how about gas optimization? That's the key. 132 features sound impressive, can you give a demo to try out?

View OriginalReply0