2026-01-12 21:21:07

Have you ever wondered where everything in Web3—virtual assets, digital identities, rare NFTs—actually resides?

The reality is quite grounded. Most so-called "permanent data" actually sits on centralized servers rented by project teams. As long as they mismanage, run out of funds, or simply disappear, everything you've carefully accumulated can vanish in an instant. No redemption, no room for reversal.

That's why infrastructure-level innovation is often more worth paying attention to than flashy applications. Just as the internet relies on TCP/IP as its foundation, the true stability of Web3 must be built on an unbreakable data storage layer.

Some projects are trying to break through. They use cryptographic techniques like erasure coding to split files into multiple mathematical fragments and distribute them across independent nodes worldwide. The advantage of this architecture is: unless the entire network is completely paralyzed, your data always exists somewhere and can be fully recovered at any time. This is a structural-level protection that doesn't rely on single points of trust.

Even more interesting is the cost dimension. Compared to traditional storage solutions, this decentralized storage can reduce unit costs to about one percent. This means that even at storage scales reaching terabytes, the cost becomes relatively affordable. Metaverse scenarios, massive AI training data, high-fidelity multimedia assets—applications that were once limited by storage costs now have economically feasible hosting solutions.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RumbleValidator

· 01-14 10:21

Paying close attention to the erasure coding system is truly necessary. A 99% cost reduction is no joke; this is exactly the kind of work infrastructure should be doing.

View OriginalReply0

BlockBargainHunter

· 01-14 09:23

Honestly, I've thought this way for a long time. Most people are still dreaming. Another story of a project running away and losing everything is about to unfold. Is this thing reliable? It sounds a bit suspicious. One percent of the cost? Let's believe it first, anyway my NFT has been gone for a long time. Decentralized storage depends on who does it. Small workshops should not join the fun. Decentralized data storage sounds great, but can it really be restored? That's the question. Single point trust? Now we are just trusting someone's wallet, huh. Infrastructure is important, I agree, but who will pay the bill? In the end, it's us. That's why I only deal with mainstream coins. Others are just gambling games. Thinking of those vanished metaverse assets, it's hilarious. Cost reduced by a hundred times? The hype about Bitcoin is impressive. I'll wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

FloorSweeper

· 01-12 21:49

Honestly, I didn't think this deeply before... now the details are truly terrifying. Another big exit scam, and when the servers go down, it's all gone. It feels like my NFTs aren't really mine. The erase coding system is indeed impressive; finally, some sense of security. One percent of the cost? That's the real game changer. Centralization is a pile of crap that will die sooner or later. Another infrastructure project full of hype, just waiting to see how it collapses. If storage costs can be cut like this, those AI projects can finally breathe a sigh of relief. Wait, can these mathematical fragments really be restored? Sounds a bit uncertain. Oh my, my JPG might have always been on a stranger's server? Decentralized storage finally has some barriers, but can it last more than two years? With costs so low, who would still use traditional solutions? Feels like waiting for the next story of a funding chain collapse... This time, it's a bit different. It's really about solving the fundamental problems.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 01-12 21:47

*adjusts alchemical instruments nervously* erasure coding as the philosopher's stone for data permanence? the yield on trustlessness here is legitimately transmuting our entire risk calculus. 1% storage costs fundamentally reshapes the protocol economics.

Reply0

PretendingSerious

· 01-12 21:32

Damn, it's the same old spiel again. Every time they talk about decentralization saving the world, and what happens? Most people still have to rely on centralized exchanges. --- Erasing code sounds impressive, but who pays if something really goes wrong? Honestly, we still have to trust people. --- One percent of the cost? Then why are my gas fees still ridiculously high, haha. --- Talking about infrastructure again. Fine, anyway, I already lost my NFT long ago. --- So in the end, it's just betting that the project team won't run away. Is there any real difference? --- These days, who still believes in the word "permanent"... --- Sounds good in theory, but it's just putting eggs in different baskets. Sooner or later, they'll all break. --- Wait, can it really be as cheap as one percent? Why don't I feel it? --- The logic is sound, but only if these nodes are reliable. Do we trust them?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-12 21:27

It's that kind of soul-searching question again: "Your coins are actually not yours at all," which really hits home. Speaking of erasure coding—sounds impressive, but when it comes to implementation, isn't it just another three or five years of waiting? When the project team runs away, no matter how good the infrastructure is, it's useless...

View OriginalReply0