2026-01-12 21:22:12

The blockchain world always promotes "decentralization" and "transparency," but looking at real financial operations makes it clear—banks, funds, and large institutions have never been fully transparent. They require privacy protection, verifiable mechanisms, and compliant frameworks.

The team at Dusk, on the other hand, directly addresses this issue: the financial system cannot and should not be 100% open; it must operate within controlled, auditable rules. This starting point determines the entire product logic.

It is not just a simple privacy chain. Dusk aims to fundamentally transform the way transactions, verification, and trust work—enabling the system itself to support genuine financial activities. The role of tokens here is also very clear: they are not only the fuel for protocol operation but, more importantly, they incentivize network participants to undertake verification and security maintenance responsibilities. The intrinsic value of the token is not based on speculation but on ensuring the network's stability, reliability, and long-term operability.

This approach is not particularly popular in the market, but it is built on a very solid foundation. It may not generate short-term hype, but it is paving the way for the migration to a true financial system.

DUSK42,99%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugPullSurvivor

· 01-15 13:03

Really, finally someone dares to say this. The truth that decentralized religious followers are unwilling to admit is — finance needs boundaries. This is the pragmatic approach, much more honest than those projects that constantly promote 100% transparency.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-15 12:59

According to on-chain data, Dusk's architecture is indeed interesting—I had guessed it long ago. Those projects that solely boast "complete transparency" are ultimately just fooling themselves. Through multi-address tracking, it can be seen that the true migration of financial institutions requires "controllable privacy" rather than "full disclosure," and Dusk has grasped this pain point. The token incentive mechanism is not just a gimmick for hype but a real infrastructure for on-chain security maintenance—an obvious logical closed loop. The short-term obscurity instead indicates that it hasn't fallen into the quick money trap of investors.

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 01-12 21:52

Finally someone has spoken out. Those who shout about decentralization are just here singing. The real finance world has long been playing the privacy + compliance game. Dusk's approach is the practical one. However, speaking of it, the lack of short-term hype... how to make money? The phrase "token value returning to its essence" I need to ponder. It sounds like they're just looking for an excuse for the price not to go up.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTherapist

· 01-12 21:51

Hey, finally someone said it. The decentralized hype has worn me out. Just now, I looked at Dusk's logic and actually felt quite clear-headed... Privacy + auditability, this is the right path for finance. Probably won't be able to copy it in the short term, but the foundation is solid enough.

View OriginalReply0

RuntimeError

· 01-12 21:32

I have to say, someone finally said it. Those who shout about decentralization every day haven't really thought about how real finance operates. I quite agree with Dusk's approach; it's much better than those pseudo-transparent projects. Privacy and auditability are not mutually exclusive, but many people misunderstand this. It's correct that there's no hype in the short term; this is about building infrastructure, not chasing concepts. The market will take a few years to respond. I'm just worried that it will be exploited by capital again and then be over, which would be a real pity.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9ad11037

· 01-12 21:26

To be honest, someone finally exposed this facade. Decentralization sounds great, but what about reality? Institutions have long understood that privacy and auditing are the bottom line of finance. I quite agree with Dusk's approach; not pretending to be pure, which makes it more reliable. Tokens are just tokens—don't try to sell me some narrative. As long as they work, that's enough. Short-term unpopular, but that just shows that no one is speculating on real infrastructure. I'm optimistic.

View OriginalReply0