Most public blockchains are still shouting "transparency is justice," but Dusk has taken a more pragmatic approach—privacy and compliance must go hand in hand.



Its positioning is clear: building privacy + compliance-friendly blockchain infrastructure using zero-knowledge proof technology. This combination is especially popular in scenarios like RWA, securitized assets, and institutional finance. Traditional finance faces an unavoidable barrier to entry—privacy protection is required, but so is auditability and regulatory compliance. Most projects either sacrifice privacy for compliance or give up regulatory features for privacy. Dusk aims to do both.

This is not just hype or narrative. It directly addresses the real challenge of Web3 financialization: how to protect users' sensitive information while making on-chain data transparent and auditable for regulators. This issue has long been overlooked, yet it is a hard requirement for institutional-grade applications to succeed.

From a value perspective, DUSK's potential is not in short-term fluctuations but in whether it can become the preferred foundational layer for compliant on-chain finance. This path is not easy, but precisely because of its difficulty, it has the potential to generate differentiated long-term value. Stay tuned to this direction.
DUSK131,74%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
IfIWereOnChainvip
· 01-15 08:36
Wow, finally someone sees this point. Privacy and compliance are really not mutually exclusive. People always insist on choosing one or the other, but they don't realize that institutions can't avoid these two requirements when entering the market. This is the truly imaginative direction, not those who just shout slogans every day.
View OriginalReply0
MEVVictimAlliancevip
· 01-14 11:12
Hmm, this approach is indeed different... Achieving both privacy and compliance sounds like walking a tightrope, but it seems to be the right direction? Actually, I just want to ask, can zero-knowledge proofs really withstand the scrutiny of regulatory authorities? Or is it another scheme that sounds impressive but actually has vulnerabilities... These foundational layer solutions might not make much noise initially, but once institutional finance truly starts to go on-chain, such solutions could indeed gain traction. However, it depends on execution and real-world application, having just the technical framework is far from enough. I'll keep an eye on it long-term, but I don't have too many illusions—there are too many tricks in this circle.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetirevip
· 01-12 21:45
This is the right way. Privacy and compliance should not be at odds with each other.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavantvip
· 01-12 21:31
ngl the privacy+compliance angle is actually based as hell, like finally someone's running the numbers instead of just yapping about transparency theater
Reply0
LonelyAnchormanvip
· 01-12 21:23
Infrastructure always makes a comeback, and this time the combination of privacy + compliance is indeed quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)