"Are you still holding onto this crappy coin in 2026? Your brain must be hibernating!" I haven't stopped hearing this sentence for half a year. Until last Wednesday morning, my phone vibrated three times in a row. On the other end of the screen was a crying tone: "Bro, is your previous judgment true? I can't hold on anymore, please don't sell first."

I didn't laugh, but I felt a bit of heartache. After all, in the market where Bitcoin plummeted 22% in December and 80% of coins collectively dove, being able to hold onto a certain asset without wavering—what kind of mentality is that? Take LUNC for example, that sideways movement feels more torturous than watching paint dry—more like milk tea that never cools to the perfect temperature. You think waiting one more second will make it drinkable, but the K-line cools even faster, fluctuating around $0.000043 for a long time.

But this is the key point. Those who mock "holding on" actually haven't seen the essence. This isn't blind faith, but a calm choice after understanding the economic model. Those who truly make money in the crypto market are not the ones chasing rallies or panic selling, but those who understand the token mechanisms.

Why is LUNC worth waiting for? The core reason is: deflation. According to on-chain data from early 2026, billions of tokens have already been burned. This is not a gimmick at a certain stage, but a circulating system formed through "community consensus + ecosystem consumption." As long as transactions keep happening, burning will continue, and the circulating supply will only decrease in one direction. This mechanism is completely different from projects sustained by fundraising or marketing—one is real economic operation, the other is a bubble.