2026-01-12 21:25:28

Modular blockchain has long been nothing new, but the real problems have just begun to surface. Data Availability (DA), a seemingly obscure technical metric, is actually becoming the biggest bottleneck for the entire ecosystem's expansion.

Why? Because traditional solutions are either not secure enough or prohibitively expensive, and trying to balance efficiency is simply a pipe dream. The recently launched solution by Walrus Protocol is quite interesting, attempting to break this deadlock with an innovative mechanism. From a technical design perspective, they are indeed thinking about how to make DA no longer a weak point.

This is not just an iteration or upgrade of a certain technology; in essence, it is an exploration of how modular blockchain architecture should be more reasonably structured. $WAL, as an important part of this ecosystem, warrants attention for its future performance.

WAL-14,04%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Anon32942

· 01-15 19:18

DA this pit is really deep, it was about time someone filled it I am optimistic about the WAL direction, but it still depends on real performance The modular approach has been talked about for so long, finally someone is seriously working on it? Balancing safety and cost is really a challenge, the Walrus idea is fresh If the bottleneck of DA isn't solved, expansion is just nonsense Honestly, compared to boastful projects, I prefer teams that seriously think about problems For the ecosystem to grow, someone has to tackle tough problems This time it's not just hype, it really feels like they're working on something genuine

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-15 15:30

DA has been stuck for too long, finally someone is seriously thinking things through.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizeMe

· 01-15 14:57

DA, this pit has finally been dug out, but whether the Walrus gameplay is reliable depends on how it will be implemented later.

View OriginalReply0

StealthDeployer

· 01-13 20:33

Someone has to take on this challenge, and Walrus's approach is indeed quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-12 21:50

DA is really hitting a bottleneck. It would be incredible if Walrus can break through this time.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 01-12 21:49

DA really hits a bottleneck, but Walrus's mechanism... depends on how stable their collateralization ratio can stay.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandsCriminal

· 01-12 21:45

I've fallen into this trap before, it's really incredible --- Here we go again, trying to fool us into trying new things. Last time, it was modularization, and it was the same story --- Walrus? Never heard of it, but it feels like we're about to get cut again --- Security and cost are always a trade-off; don't tell me I can have both --- Has $WAL gone up? Otherwise, I don't care about the architecture --- This is the never-ending vicious cycle that blockchain can never solve

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterNoLoss

· 01-12 21:45

DA has indeed been stuck, it was long overdue for someone to perform surgery on it. Whether Walrus can truly turn things around still depends on real-world application; looking good on paper doesn't help. Whether $WAL can rise this time mainly depends on whether the ecosystem can really be utilized. The contradiction between safety and cost feels like it can never be resolved. Modularization was originally a trap, and now I realize that DA is the real deep pit.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 01-12 21:29

It's the usual talk about DA, but this time Walrus really went all out with punches and kicks.

View OriginalReply0

DancingCandles

· 01-12 21:26

DA has indeed been stuck for too long, Walrus's approach is quite interesting. The future of WAL still depends on whether it can truly solve the cost issues; otherwise, it's just talk. The modular architecture problems are only now beginning to surface, indicating that previous planning was indeed not comprehensive enough. Safety, cost, and efficiency—the triangle—choosing two is already good; I haven't seen a project that can have all three. Will this round of DA solutions be just a flash in the pan? Let's wait and see WAL's actual performance.

View OriginalReply0