2026-01-12 21:36:28

SUN token showing solid bullish momentum right now. The vibe in the market looks pretty optimistic around this altcoin. Technically speaking, traders are keeping an eye on the $0.005 support level—that's the floor holding things up. On the flip side, $0.007 is acting as key resistance. Watch how price action plays out between these levels; breaking above resistance could signal the next leg up, while failing to hold support might spark some weakness. SUN and similar altcoins have been gaining traction lately, especially among those tracking emerging AI crypto plays.

SUN1,73%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainWorker

· 01-14 22:17

NGL Sun, this move is a bit impressive, but the 0.007 level feels a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologist

· 01-14 19:10

Hmm, I really think SUN this time is quite interesting. If 0.005 doesn't hold, it's game over.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-12 22:05

ah here we go again... $0.005 support, $0.007 resistance. statistically speaking, this is exactly how the 2021 altseason playbook opened before 90% of these tokens got absolutely obliterated. those who don't study their 2018 charts are legit doomed to repeat them ngl

Reply0

MetaMaximalist

· 01-12 21:58

ngl the $0.005 support feels kinda flimsy for something claiming to be "emerging ai play"... like have y'all actually looked at the underlying tokenomics or are we just chasing shitcoin seasonality again

Reply0

BearMarketBro

· 01-12 21:50

What’s the point of SUN rising so much? What should we do if it breaks 0.005?

View OriginalReply0

PseudoIntellectual

· 01-12 21:43

Once again, it's the same narrative of support and resistance. Can 0.007 really break through? It all feels like a routine.

View OriginalReply0