The liquidity ecosystem is heating up. Recently, several mainstream liquidity staking projects have launched a new generation of LST liquidity pools, and their new homes are on the latest version of a major DEX. What is the logic behind this? Why is the latest version of the AMM architecture particularly friendly to LST pools? In simple terms, the improved automated market maker mechanism offers better slippage control, more efficient capital utilization, and dedicated optimizations for stable asset trading pairs. For highly correlated asset pairs like LSTs, this upgrade can significantly enhance the收益空间 for liquidity providers while improving the trading experience for traders. In the short term, it is a product iteration; in the long term, it signals that DeFi infrastructure is evolving toward a more mature direction.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
potentially_notable
· 01-15 09:33
LST this wave has indeed become intense, but who can truly make money depends on whose slippage is the most optimal...
---
The new AMM architecture sounds appealing, but the key is whether the actual returns can keep up with the hype.
---
Another round of infrastructure upgrades, it feels like every time they say they will change DeFi, it's still the same group reaping the benefits.
---
Improving capital utilization sounds good, but can LPs really get a piece of the pie?
---
No one used to do anything about stable asset optimization before...
---
If slippage control is handled well, whether the trading pairs' depth can keep up is the real issue.
---
Is DeFi infrastructure mature? I think it's more like a new coat of paint before another round of slicing.
---
With LST liquidity pools flooding in, could this be another liquidity trap...
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 01-14 18:36
LST pool flocking to new DEX versions, to put it simply, it's the same old trick—whoever has higher returns, everyone rushes there.
The increase in capital utilization sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another new way to cut a wave of retail investors.
Will this truly improve slippage, or is it just talk on paper? We need to see the data.
Is DeFi infrastructure mature? Ha, I still see it as fragile.
Every upgrade is hyped up to the skies, but in the end, it's just the team running away or contract bugs.
Feels a bit like hype manipulation...
View OriginalReply0
OvertimeSquid
· 01-13 01:55
LST liquidity has really heated up this time. The new version of AMM's optimization for stable trading pairs definitely has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketman
· 01-12 22:08
Hey, finally seeing the LST trajectory accelerating. Slippage control should have been sorted out long ago. This time, capital efficiency has truly opened a new launch window.
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictim
· 01-12 22:08
LST this wave is indeed a good time to buy the dip. Optimizing slippage can save a lot of gas fees.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTarotReader
· 01-12 22:06
The narrative around LST is resurging again, claiming infrastructure upgrades each time, but the real profit still comes from that early group of players...
View OriginalReply0
DaoTherapy
· 01-12 22:00
LST is indeed accelerating this time, but to be honest, the slippage in those previous pools was really outrageous. Finally, someone has figured this out.
---
The new AMM architecture being so friendly to LST indicates that everyone is competing on efficiency. Without evolution, you'll be eliminated.
---
Capital utilization has improved, and LPs can finally breathe a sigh of relief. The previous returns were really disappointing.
---
DeFi infrastructure is becoming more competitive, which is good. We need to move towards something usable.
---
Exclusive optimization for stable asset trading pairs? Isn't this signaling that the era of LST is coming? I'll bet on an ecosystem token.
---
Slippage control optimization may seem insignificant, but it makes a huge difference for large transactions. Finally, someone cares about this.
---
This upgrade feels like paving the way for the entire LST track. It's interesting—let's see who can come up with innovative ideas next.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 01-12 21:57
LST pools are migrating to the new version. In simple terms, it's lower slippage and higher capital efficiency. LPs can finally start earning money from their efforts.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtist
· 01-12 21:51
LST pools flocking to new DEX versions, in simple terms, means slippage control and capital efficiency have truly outperformed.
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWallet
· 01-12 21:47
Old wallets have all moved to the new version to buy the dip. Slippage control is indeed necessary; previously, there might have been significant losses that could now be recovered.
The liquidity ecosystem is heating up. Recently, several mainstream liquidity staking projects have launched a new generation of LST liquidity pools, and their new homes are on the latest version of a major DEX. What is the logic behind this? Why is the latest version of the AMM architecture particularly friendly to LST pools? In simple terms, the improved automated market maker mechanism offers better slippage control, more efficient capital utilization, and dedicated optimizations for stable asset trading pairs. For highly correlated asset pairs like LSTs, this upgrade can significantly enhance the收益空间 for liquidity providers while improving the trading experience for traders. In the short term, it is a product iteration; in the long term, it signals that DeFi infrastructure is evolving toward a more mature direction.