A turbulent power transition is unfolding in Washington—over the next few years, the flow of global funds will likely depend on the battle for the next Federal Reserve Chair.



According to the latest information, current Fed Chair Jerome Powell is expected to leave after his term ends in May due to involvement in an investigation. The competition for his successor has already entered a heated phase, with three candidates each holding their own cards.

**Who will sit in the Fed Chair position?**

First is the widely favored BlackRock executive, Reid. This traditional asset management giant's leader has almost no government experience, making him a complete "outsider." But this is precisely his advantage—he comes from BlackRock, which recently received approval to launch a Bitcoin spot ETF, and has a much deeper understanding of the digital asset ecosystem than traditional financial bureaucrats. If he takes the helm at the Fed, it could mean that cryptocurrencies receive an "official endorsement" from the highest financial decision-making level.

Next is Haskett, a former economic advisor to Trump and a pure political insider. If he takes office, the independence of the Fed will be significantly diminished, and policies are likely to favor government fiscal expansion and liquidity injections. This could lead to a large-scale money-printing cycle, directly catalyzing narratives around "inflation-resistant assets" like Bitcoin.

There is also a dark horse who is often overlooked—current Fed Governor Waller, who is well known in the crypto community. He has publicly stated the need for more aggressive rate cuts to prevent a recession and is regarded as a "dove" within the industry. Coming from within the Fed, he can ensure policy continuity, and his advocacy for rate cuts is itself beneficial for liquidity-dense asset classes.

**Who takes office, and how will the market move?**

If it’s Reid: The collision point between traditional finance and the crypto world will be intense. His expertise in bonds could accelerate the start of a rate-cutting cycle, and BlackRock’s background suggests institutional-level crypto asset allocations will become more policy-friendly. This could mark a critical point where the crypto market shifts from "wild growth" to "mainstream acceptance."

If it’s Haskett: The Fed becomes a tool for fiscal policy and money printing. Excess liquidity will directly boost demand for all hedging assets, and Bitcoin’s narrative as "digital gold" for value storage will be reinforced. But this also brings increased policy uncertainty and regulatory battles.

If it’s Waller: Although the candidate is from within the Fed, his clear dovish stance is a long-term positive for the crypto market. Expectations of interest rate environment shifts always act as catalysts for risk assets.

Regardless of who ultimately takes the position, one thing is certain: this round of Fed leadership transition is not only a macro financial restructuring but also a watershed moment for the crypto market’s policy recognition. The cycles of rate cuts, liquidity expectations, and regulatory attitudes will all be re-priced. For investors, this moment warrants close attention—every transfer of central bank power has historically been a key window for redistributing wealth.
BTC-0,1%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StableGeniusDegenvip
· 8h ago
Reid taking the stage, I go all in directly. BlackRock's background means institutional investors will massively enter the market. By then, not just BTC, the entire ecosystem will take off. Pigeon-hawk Waller is actually the dark horse winner. When the rate cut cycle starts, liquidity is king. If Haskett really takes office, it will be crazy. The Federal Reserve will completely become a printing machine. At that time, holding coins will be the only way out. Honestly, it doesn't matter who wins among these three; it's all about whether the timing is right. Wait, will Powell really step down just because of that? Something feels off. Power transition = wealth reshuffle. I’ve believed in this logic since 2016, and I’ve never been wrong. Lower your position and wait. In the face of such major events, rushing is the worst. We need to watch the public opinion trend before May before making moves.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 8h ago
All three options are painting a big picture for us, but why does Reed seem the most likely... BlackRock's background is really impressive. No matter who takes over, my Bitcoin won't deceive me. Dovish Waller is the one who truly understands the market; rate cuts mean printing money, and printing money means we win. Hasset's Trump-style approach feels like it could directly turn the Federal Reserve into a branch of the Central Mom, haha. If Reed really takes over, then our group can finally be taken seriously? Oh my God, among these three, I'm most afraid of Hasset. Without the independence of the Federal Reserve, the market will really go haywire. Waller is low-key, but his dovish stance is genuine. That's the most solid signal for us.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriservip
· 8h ago
Reid taking the stage is the right move, BlackRock handling the Bitcoin spot ETF, this time directly steering the Federal Reserve? Cryptocurrency is becoming mainstream from now on. Waller has a pretty dovish image, but it still depends on how liquidity moves; when the rate cut cycle begins, everything will rise. Hasset's approach is too wild, losing independence—if the Fed isn't called a central bank anymore. Really, these personnel changes will determine the wealth landscape for the next few years; missing this opportunity has a huge opportunity cost. Whoever wins, we follow them—this is the best window for policy arbitrage, isn't it? Wait, what is the investigation event? Why did Powell suddenly want to step down? The moment assets are re-priced is the best time to position; now, keep a close eye. Once rate cut expectations are confirmed, risk assets will take off directly, another wave of wealth transfer. The logic of Bitcoin as a hedging tool is becoming more and more solid; we can't be too conservative right now. Washington's game, in simple terms, is about seeing who can inject liquidity and give the green light.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 8h ago
Reid takes the stage, and I will go all in on BTC. BlackRock's endorsement is more valuable than anything else. --- Hasset's turn on stage is like starting the printing press. Actually, this isn't a bad thing for us. --- I think Waller, being dovish, is promising. As soon as the rate cut expectation emerges, funds immediately flow into risk assets. --- Honestly, I can accept any of the three, just worried that an hawkish candidate might be chosen and cause trouble for us. --- The transfer of central bank power is really a reshuffling of wealth. Missing this wave means waiting four years. --- BlackRock's spot ETF just launched, and Reid takes the stage with official endorsement? This script is a bit too perfect, haha. --- The Federal Reserve's independence is almost gone, and they're still acting like it’s business as usual. --- I feel Waller is underestimated. A dovish rate cut directly catalyzes liquidity assets. --- Whoever takes the stage will have to print money; the only difference is how much they print. --- Waiting to see who is ultimately chosen. This decision will affect the capital flow over the next few years.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorkervip
· 8h ago
Reid's rise means I'm all in; BlackRock's background directly gives BTC a green light --- Waller's dovish rate cut is the real positive, everything else is just虚的 --- Hasset's appointment and the start of money printing; not holding coins then would be foolish --- Federal Reserve leadership change = official recognition of crypto; this logic makes sense, right? --- Wait, will Reid really fully open up crypto? It seems good on paper, but the actual operation might still be the same old story --- The era of liquidity flooding has arrived; not holding Bitcoin is almost embarrassing to say you’re trading crypto --- Power transfer is always the time for the leeks to be harvested; as usual, a wave of cuts --- If Waller is truly dovish, then I think it's settled; if interest rates drop and asset prices don't surge, that would be strange --- The BlackRock spot ETF was just approved, and now rumors say Reid wants to join the Fed; this setup is too outrageous --- Basically, it’s about who dislikes crypto the least; everything else is just虚头
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000vip
· 8h ago
Oh no, now it really depends on who takes over. It feels like whether the crypto market can turn around depends on this wave. --- If Reed takes office and BlackRock endorses it, maybe we retail investors can finally breathe a sigh of relief. --- But I still think Hasset is the most likely, after all, Trump's connections are too strong. --- Waller is dovish? Then does a rate cut mean we're eating this time? --- Honestly, instead of focusing on who comes to power, it's better to see who is secretly accumulating during this wave. --- The Federal Reserve's power transfer = wealth reshuffle. I believe in this logic. --- Is it still possible to start positioning now, everyone? Feels like we're about to miss another opportunity. --- Once the rate cut cycle starts, liquidity assets will all rise, not just Bitcoin. --- Can we stop just talking politics and directly tell me how to operate BTC? Really. --- With the printing cycle coming, will Bitcoin still be a hedge asset? This logic is a bit contradictory.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)