Recently followed an interesting creator worth talking about.
My first impression is—although the follower count isn't large, they can still consistently receive platform incentives. What does this indicate? It shows that the square is not really a place where follower numbers matter. As long as the content resonates with people, it can still gain recognition and rewards.
More importantly, he runs the "Daily Information Gap" section. Honestly, this angle is really clever. The crypto world is flooded with information, and most people are passively receiving it. Few are systematically analyzing the market's "temperature difference." He has captured this need and updates it daily, like installing an information filter for users.
The underlying logic is actually very simple: choose a niche direction and stick to deep cultivation. Don't chase trends or make big promises; just focus on doing one thing well. Content like this is most likely to attract truly valuable users on the square. In the long run, this is the way to make big money.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MintMaster
· 12h ago
This guy's approach is indeed on point. Small and high-quality content is the only way to cultivate loyal fans.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 12h ago
Really, small accounts can actually accumulate core users; having more followers isn't necessarily useful.
I'm optimistic about the daily update strategy to exploit information gaps, but you have to stick with it—not everyone can endure.
Specializing deeply in a niche area is truly valuable. Less talk, more focused output—this logic makes sense.
But it depends on how long you can persist. A three-month trend versus a year of stability—these two concepts are vastly different.
The top competitors are all chasing hot topics, but those who quietly dig their wells are more likely to break through.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 12h ago
Even a small fan base can be successful and thriving, I really respect that. Sticking to a vertical niche is truly more reliable than chasing hot topics.
Recently followed an interesting creator worth talking about.
My first impression is—although the follower count isn't large, they can still consistently receive platform incentives. What does this indicate? It shows that the square is not really a place where follower numbers matter. As long as the content resonates with people, it can still gain recognition and rewards.
More importantly, he runs the "Daily Information Gap" section. Honestly, this angle is really clever. The crypto world is flooded with information, and most people are passively receiving it. Few are systematically analyzing the market's "temperature difference." He has captured this need and updates it daily, like installing an information filter for users.
The underlying logic is actually very simple: choose a niche direction and stick to deep cultivation. Don't chase trends or make big promises; just focus on doing one thing well. Content like this is most likely to attract truly valuable users on the square. In the long run, this is the way to make big money.