Participating in any compliant project now requires uploading personal privacy data—passport, ID card, home address—sending them out, fearing they might be resold to scammers. This is not Web3; it's a step backward.
The Dusk Foundation's Citadel protocol has changed the approach. Instead of sending raw data externally, it generates encrypted proofs locally, and you only need to tell the project "I meet the conditions." The project team has no access to your actual information; you control your data. This is true data sovereignty.
In practical applications, in the future, if you want to participate in on-chain trading of regulated assets like stocks and funds, you can directly use this digital identity system. It meets regulatory compliance while not giving up your privacy—it's like achieving both the fish and the bear's paw.
The beauty of Dusk lies here: every identity verification and compliance operation consumes $DUSK tokens. Tying the token burn mechanism to high-frequency activities makes this deflationary logic truly hardcore. In the short term, it's supported by demand; in the long term, continuous burning driven by ecosystem expansion. Compared to projects that are nominally deflationary but practically useless, this design is truly solid.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 10h ago
This is true privacy protection. There's no need to expose your ID card; generating proof locally is enough. Dusk's approach is indeed clear-headed.
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者
· 10h ago
This is a project that truly understands privacy, unlike those that constantly talk about decentralization but are actually centralized and just harvesting profits.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 10h ago
Someone finally explained privacy and compliance thoroughly. Citadel's approach is indeed brilliant.
The idea of generating cryptographic proofs locally is truly what Web3 should look like.
Linking the destruction mechanism to high-frequency transactions is much more reliable than those purely theoretical deflation models.
Data sovereignty is a serious topic that really needs a proper discussion. We can't just treat everything as diplomacy.
Wait, how do project teams verify proofs generated locally? Are there any risks involved in this?
View OriginalReply0
LightningLady
· 10h ago
This is the Web3 I want — having control over my data, feeling comfortable.
Participating in any compliant project now requires uploading personal privacy data—passport, ID card, home address—sending them out, fearing they might be resold to scammers. This is not Web3; it's a step backward.
The Dusk Foundation's Citadel protocol has changed the approach. Instead of sending raw data externally, it generates encrypted proofs locally, and you only need to tell the project "I meet the conditions." The project team has no access to your actual information; you control your data. This is true data sovereignty.
In practical applications, in the future, if you want to participate in on-chain trading of regulated assets like stocks and funds, you can directly use this digital identity system. It meets regulatory compliance while not giving up your privacy—it's like achieving both the fish and the bear's paw.
The beauty of Dusk lies here: every identity verification and compliance operation consumes $DUSK tokens. Tying the token burn mechanism to high-frequency activities makes this deflationary logic truly hardcore. In the short term, it's supported by demand; in the long term, continuous burning driven by ecosystem expansion. Compared to projects that are nominally deflationary but practically useless, this design is truly solid.