#比特币储备战略 Seeing this news, I am thinking about a very practical question — as large banks gradually gain compliant pathways to offer digital asset custody and staking services, how should we view this transition?

Honestly, this is not an exciting "breakthrough" news; rather, it is a necessary institutional complement. Standardized custody and services can indeed protect consumers and reduce risks, but because of this, I want to remind everyone of an easily overlooked point — compliance does not equal profit, and safety does not equal profitability.

Some friends, upon seeing the advancement of such policies, tend to develop a "trend is inevitable" mindset and start increasing their allocation. But my experience is that the clearer the policies are, the more calm you need to stay. History has shown us that every asset has its cycle; friendly policies are just one aspect of the fundamentals and do not guarantee the direction.

My advice is: if you already have allocations in this field, this is an opportunity to reassess whether your positions are reasonable — do they exceed your risk tolerance? If you are still on the sidelines, there’s no need to rush to follow the trend; instead, take the time to understand your risk capacity and then decide whether to participate.

In the long run, compliant financial infrastructure is indeed beneficial to the market. But realizing these benefits takes time; it’s not something that happens overnight. Patience and vigilance are often more valuable than chasing hot topics.