2026-01-18 08:51:25

#美国核心物价涨幅不及市场预估 Bitcoin's 14th transformation has arrived, and the key is what happens next.

Over the past 8 months, I've noticed a very solid phenomenon—after each transformation point, Bitcoin's reaction is astonishingly consistent. This isn't some mysticism; the data is right there.

The retracement magnitude is quite regular: usually between 5-6% after a transformation, occasionally more intense. After 14 days, the average decline is roughly 5-8%. Now, from the high point, it has already fallen about 4%, and the trend basically aligns with historical patterns.

If this pace continues, the most critical time to watch should be around January 28.

My trading logic over these 5 months has been centered around this recurring pattern. I'm not making fancy predictions; I'm constantly testing whether this model is reliable. As long as it remains effective, I follow it.

In the market, honestly, it doesn't matter how smart you are; those who make money are usually the ones who truly understand the rhythm.

$BTC $ETH $SOL

BTC-3,79%

ETH-7,1%

SOL-5,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FUD_Whisperer

· 01-19 13:01

January 28th is a critical day, it feels like another wave is coming. To be honest, after watching these regular patterns for a long time, it can get a bit addictive, but I'm just worried that one day they might suddenly become invalid. The transition points always match so precisely, I'm half convinced and half skeptical. But since it can consistently make money, it definitely indicates there's something there. It's the old saying: timing is more important than anything. Most people don't even know what they're betting on. This logical pattern lasting for 5 months also pretty much proves the point. However, the more stable the pattern, the easier it is to be broken. Better to be cautious. The data is real, but I still suspect whether these patterns are just coincidental clusters. Yeah, around the 28th, we need to keep a close eye. The feeling of historical coincidence is indeed a bit eerie. If this pattern continues, there probably won't be any big surprises in the near future. It's just about whether we can maintain this rhythm.

View OriginalReply0

DefiSecurityGuard

· 01-19 03:12

⚠️ CRITICAL: pattern recognition ain't audit-resistant, friend. seen this "historical rhythm" argument 47 times before rugpulls. what's your exit vector if jan 28 breaks the model? DYOR, not financial advice.

Reply0

IronHeadMiner

· 01-18 09:20

Mastering this logic, the showdown will happen on January 28, and we're betting that it will continue this time.

View OriginalReply0

On-ChainDiver

· 01-18 09:17

1. The 28th is going to explode, I bet 5 ETH that this time it's still following the usual pattern 2. Whether it's reliable or not depends on the next few days, it's too early to tell now 3. Sense of rhythm really works better than technical analysis, I made money this way too 4. Wait, where did you get this data from? I can't see it myself 5. History repeats itself, right? I'll follow your signals and make a move 6. How come this transition cycle is so accurate? Luckily I discovered this pattern 7. Wait another two weeks and see, anyway I have free time 8. Sounds reliable, but I'm still cautious, I'll observe first 9. Waiting for January 28, if it’s going to explode, let’s explode together 10. The pattern has repeated so many times without breaking, I believe you this time

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru

· 01-18 09:15

The data is right there; the 14% cyclical pattern is actually quite significant. I remember the key point on January 28th, watching it.

View OriginalReply0

SleepTrader

· 01-18 09:13

Wow, January 28th at this point definitely needs to be marked down. I kind of believe this guy's logic.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-18 09:08

The data structure is quite clear; I'm just worried about a black swan event caused by a re-entrancy attack at some node.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinEnjoyer

· 01-18 09:04

This cycle is quite interesting; the 5-8% decline range does seem to follow a pattern. The key question is whether the milestone on January 28th will be fulfilled on time.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 01-18 09:01

Is this model really that stable? I always feel like I'm about to be proven wrong next time.

View OriginalReply0