The crypto market is a visual feast every day. The carnival of NFTs, the surge of Meme coins, the successive appearances of new public chains—all attract attention with dazzling numbers and stories. But what about DUSK? It’s often drowned out by these noises, appearing cold and quiet.
But I’ve been observing this space for years and want to share something different with you. The unseen things are often the truly important ones—trillions of dollars in assets are flowing through a hidden pipeline, designed to be "invisible" in form. You don’t see them dancing on the chain, not because they don’t exist, but because they simply don’t need to.
**Why the TVL metric is failing here**
Our common tool to measure the DeFi ecosystem is TVL (Total Value Locked). On Compound or Aave, what does a $1 billion TVL mean? It means that $1 billion is constantly being borrowed, earning interest, and circulating across various protocols, generating continuous on-chain activity.
Switch to DUSK, and that same $1 billion TVL looks completely different. It may not participate in any DeFi interactions at all—for example, a private bank tokenizes its clients’ real estate funds and holds them on-chain. These tokens represent real assets of $10 billion from 100 high-net-worth clients. But these tokens just sit quietly, with ownership transfers controlled within legal frameworks.
They don’t generate yield through lending protocols, don’t participate in liquidity mining, and aren’t automatically scheduled by "gunpowder pool" algorithms. From the on-chain activity perspective, they seem cold and inactive. But behind each token stands a heavy legal document and real physical assets.
**Iceberg theory: what you see is only the surface**
Many people use TVL to judge a chain’s value, which is like using the small tip of an iceberg floating on the surface to estimate the size of the entire iceberg—an obviously wrong conclusion.
The core value of DUSK is not primarily financialization, but in rights confirmation and record-keeping. What are the pain points of traditional finance? Information asymmetry, easy falsification of documents, cross-border rights verification. Blockchain addresses exactly these issues. A real estate ownership, a bond, an intellectual property—once tokenized on-chain, automatically gains timestamps and tamper-proof proof.
Compared to that, the "activity" of $1 billion bouncing around on the chain in Compound, or the value of that same $1 billion permanently confirmed on-chain— which is more important? It depends on your perspective. DeFi enthusiasts value the former, but true institutional asset managers care more about the latter.
**A new financial paradigm is quietly taking shape**
Imagine the future financial landscape: your real estate, bonds, art collections, private equity shares—all exist as on-chain tokens. Not for speculation, not for mining incentives, but to have a universally accepted, tamper-proof, verifiable proof of ownership. Cross-border transfers, inheritance, collateral— all become transparent, efficient, and low-cost.
This is not just DeFi; it’s a fundamental overhaul of the entire financial infrastructure. And what DUSK is doing is paving the way for this revolution.
Right now, it looks quiet. On-chain activity data isn’t dazzling, and news buzz is lagging. But those using traditional metrics to evaluate it are like looking at a panoramic view through a magnifying glass—seeing details but missing the big picture. The real story is slowly unfolding in the deep sea.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 7h ago
Stories in the deep sea are indeed easy to overlook, but I still have some doubts about the logic of TVL failure.
---
Basically, it's about gambling institutions entering the market. It's just that we can't see clearly yet.
---
The iceberg theory is a good metaphor, but DUSK doesn't even have many icebergs surfacing right now.
---
The idea of property rights sounds impressive, but how many institutions are actually using on-chain solutions for this?
---
Trillions of dollars are flowing in the shadows, I believe that, but I'm more concerned about when I can cash out.
---
Instead of saying the deep sea is unfolding, it's more like we're still in the basement.
---
This logic has a bit of a reverse narrative flavor—low activity means big potential? Let's see if we can convince more people to believe this.
---
It's interesting, but it feels like it's just defending DUSK's quiet period, always missing that certain spark.
---
If there were truly trillions of assets on the chain, how could no one know?
---
Using real estate on the chain as an example, but in reality, regulatory frameworks in various countries haven't sorted this out yet. It's a bit premature to talk about it.
---
I believe in new financial models, but is DUSK necessarily the right path? What about other players?
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilient
· 7h ago
That's right, the TVL gameplay indeed failed at DUSK.
Deep-sea assets can't be seen clearly in the short term, but institutions are already quietly accumulating assets.
Honestly, everyone is now hyping NFTs and Memes. DUSK's rights confirmation activities are indeed cold, but behind the coldness is real money.
When traditional assets go on-chain as a norm one day, the value of this chain will be revealed.
People calling it cold and quiet now will all regret it later.
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeacher
· 7h ago
Quiet? That means the chips are still cheap, and institutions haven't fully entered yet.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 7h ago
Quiet? That means it hasn't been hyped up yet. Potential stocks are often like this—low profile.
---
Honestly, the TVL metric really needs an upgrade. If we keep calculating like this, all RWA projects will be doomed.
---
Stories from the deep sea... sound good, but how do we participate, brother? We can't just wait for appreciation, right?
---
Institutions see this clearly. We're retail investors still chasing hot topics, while they are already laying out the next financial system.
---
Feels like a good story, but does DUSK really have that many institutional assets on-chain? Let the data speak.
---
So, DUSK is actually about building financial infrastructure, not DeFi. This approach is quite innovative.
---
I get the iceberg theory, but the problem is we can't see what's underwater. How do we judge whether it's a gold mine or just ice?
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 7h ago
Oh, finally someone dares to tell the truth about DUSK. I knew it—those who only look at TVL are really blind men feeling an elephant.
Wait, about the rights confirmation and proof of existence... can it really be sold? Or is it just a beautiful vision?
Will institutions really come? Or is it just another pie in the sky?
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 7h ago
Wow, someone finally said it. The TVL metric really should be retired.
It's quiet now, but that $1 billion real estate token is worth much more than the trash liquidity on Aave.
Things in the deep sea are always the most valuable, just out of the spotlight.
This is true infrastructure, not some mining game.
The crypto market is a visual feast every day. The carnival of NFTs, the surge of Meme coins, the successive appearances of new public chains—all attract attention with dazzling numbers and stories. But what about DUSK? It’s often drowned out by these noises, appearing cold and quiet.
But I’ve been observing this space for years and want to share something different with you. The unseen things are often the truly important ones—trillions of dollars in assets are flowing through a hidden pipeline, designed to be "invisible" in form. You don’t see them dancing on the chain, not because they don’t exist, but because they simply don’t need to.
**Why the TVL metric is failing here**
Our common tool to measure the DeFi ecosystem is TVL (Total Value Locked). On Compound or Aave, what does a $1 billion TVL mean? It means that $1 billion is constantly being borrowed, earning interest, and circulating across various protocols, generating continuous on-chain activity.
Switch to DUSK, and that same $1 billion TVL looks completely different. It may not participate in any DeFi interactions at all—for example, a private bank tokenizes its clients’ real estate funds and holds them on-chain. These tokens represent real assets of $10 billion from 100 high-net-worth clients. But these tokens just sit quietly, with ownership transfers controlled within legal frameworks.
They don’t generate yield through lending protocols, don’t participate in liquidity mining, and aren’t automatically scheduled by "gunpowder pool" algorithms. From the on-chain activity perspective, they seem cold and inactive. But behind each token stands a heavy legal document and real physical assets.
**Iceberg theory: what you see is only the surface**
Many people use TVL to judge a chain’s value, which is like using the small tip of an iceberg floating on the surface to estimate the size of the entire iceberg—an obviously wrong conclusion.
The core value of DUSK is not primarily financialization, but in rights confirmation and record-keeping. What are the pain points of traditional finance? Information asymmetry, easy falsification of documents, cross-border rights verification. Blockchain addresses exactly these issues. A real estate ownership, a bond, an intellectual property—once tokenized on-chain, automatically gains timestamps and tamper-proof proof.
Compared to that, the "activity" of $1 billion bouncing around on the chain in Compound, or the value of that same $1 billion permanently confirmed on-chain— which is more important? It depends on your perspective. DeFi enthusiasts value the former, but true institutional asset managers care more about the latter.
**A new financial paradigm is quietly taking shape**
Imagine the future financial landscape: your real estate, bonds, art collections, private equity shares—all exist as on-chain tokens. Not for speculation, not for mining incentives, but to have a universally accepted, tamper-proof, verifiable proof of ownership. Cross-border transfers, inheritance, collateral— all become transparent, efficient, and low-cost.
This is not just DeFi; it’s a fundamental overhaul of the entire financial infrastructure. And what DUSK is doing is paving the way for this revolution.
Right now, it looks quiet. On-chain activity data isn’t dazzling, and news buzz is lagging. But those using traditional metrics to evaluate it are like looking at a panoramic view through a magnifying glass—seeing details but missing the big picture. The real story is slowly unfolding in the deep sea.