The consensus view holds up well enough—at least for now. A debt spiral or accelerated trade tensions could trigger rapid, disruptive market adjustments, but neither scenario looks imminent. Trade friction may intensify, yes, but an acute debt crisis? That's still the lower-probability tail risk. Market participants banking on stability should stay alert to these pressure points, but the near-term outlook remains anchored by the assumption that policy brakes won't lock up suddenly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Frontrunner
· 9h ago
It sounds good, but the premise of "temporary stability" is too fragile; a single straw could crush the camel.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 9h ago
Will the policy brake suddenly fail? Ha, I've heard that too many times.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 9h ago
Tired of the same old "temporarily stable" excuse again.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 9h ago
I wonder how long this wave of consensus can last; it might collapse someday.
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 9h ago
It sounds like things are still stable for now, but I'm just worried that one day the policies might suddenly lose control.
The consensus view holds up well enough—at least for now. A debt spiral or accelerated trade tensions could trigger rapid, disruptive market adjustments, but neither scenario looks imminent. Trade friction may intensify, yes, but an acute debt crisis? That's still the lower-probability tail risk. Market participants banking on stability should stay alert to these pressure points, but the near-term outlook remains anchored by the assumption that policy brakes won't lock up suddenly.