When some major economies maintain tight control over their external accounts, others without such mechanisms find themselves forced to adapt. They have to reshape their trade and industrial policies to fit around what the controlling economies decide to do. It's an imbalance baked into the system—those with the levers of control don't have to bend. Those without them do.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PerennialLeek
· 11h ago
This is the current international order. Whoever holds the chips gets to speak, and the rest can only be forced to follow suit.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationAlert
· 12h ago
This is the reality: those in power are always at the top, while retail economies are being played to death.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStaker
· 12h ago
nah this is literally just centralized gatekeeping dressed up as macroeconomics... stronger entities dictating terms, weaker ones adapting. rinse and repeat. where's the decentralization promise we were sold again?
Reply0
LiquidityWitch
· 12h ago
ngl this is just the traditional finance version of liquidity wars... the ones holding the levers brew the alpha while everyone else gets liquidated. same ritual, different stage fr
Reply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 12h ago
This is the current game rule: those who hold the right to speak will never suffer losses.
When some major economies maintain tight control over their external accounts, others without such mechanisms find themselves forced to adapt. They have to reshape their trade and industrial policies to fit around what the controlling economies decide to do. It's an imbalance baked into the system—those with the levers of control don't have to bend. Those without them do.