The on-chain accounts of TRON have surpassed 360 million. This number is not fake—it is the result of real usage accumulation.
Why are so many people using TRON? Ultimately, it comes down to these points: what does the number of accounts reflect? First is the cost advantage. Transfer fees are ridiculously low, with USDT transfers often approaching zero cost, making small fund flows completely stress-free. This is a necessity for users who interact frequently. Second is speed. On-chain confirmations only take a few seconds, providing a smooth high-frequency operation experience. Compared to other public chains that take tens of seconds or even longer to produce blocks, this advantage is obvious. It is these two factors—low fees + fast speed—that have made TRON the practical choice for many. The growth in account numbers essentially reflects users voting with their feet.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVSupportGroup
· 9h ago
3.6 billion accounts sound impressive, but how many are truly active?
---
Low fees + fast transactions are indeed attractive, but major players have long moved to Ethereum
---
USDT zero-cost transfers are truly unbeatable, a paradise for small investors
---
Having many accounts does not equal a strong ecosystem; this logic should be approached with caution
---
When transfer fees are cheap, go for TRON, a typical pursuit of liquidity
---
Fast speed and low costs are undeniable advantages, no wonder so many people are here
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivor
· 9h ago
3.6 billion accounts, to be honest, sound a bit outrageous, but it's indeed incredibly cheap, with almost no fees to transfer U.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 9h ago
3.6 billion accounts sound great, but how many are truly active?
Don't just look at the numbers; trading volume is the real king.
TRON is indeed cheap and fast, but the ecosystem is still a bit thin.
Low fees definitely hit the mark, meeting the needs of small users.
Fast speed is great, but how is security ensured?
Just want to know how many zombie accounts are among these...
Voting with your feet, huh? Well, low gas fees are really the biggest attraction.
Cheap, fast + stable—this is TRON's core competitiveness.
Having many users doesn't necessarily mean a good ecosystem; be clear on that.
Low fees are enjoyable, but don't overlook the risks.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 9h ago
36 million accounts, in other words, it's all about the money talking. The fees are incredibly low.
That's right, TRON is now a paradise for arbitrage players, with transfer costs almost zero. Who wouldn't love that?
The phrase "vote with your feet" is very appropriate; data backed by real cash is the most convincing.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegen
· 9h ago
ngl, 3.6b accounts sounds like a lot until you realize half are probably dust wallets and bot farms lmao... but yeah the fees ARE stupid cheap, can't deny that. the real cascade effect tho? everyone's just chasing liquidity where it's liquid, that's the alpha right there.
The on-chain accounts of TRON have surpassed 360 million. This number is not fake—it is the result of real usage accumulation.
Why are so many people using TRON? Ultimately, it comes down to these points: what does the number of accounts reflect? First is the cost advantage. Transfer fees are ridiculously low, with USDT transfers often approaching zero cost, making small fund flows completely stress-free. This is a necessity for users who interact frequently. Second is speed. On-chain confirmations only take a few seconds, providing a smooth high-frequency operation experience. Compared to other public chains that take tens of seconds or even longer to produce blocks, this advantage is obvious. It is these two factors—low fees + fast speed—that have made TRON the practical choice for many. The growth in account numbers essentially reflects users voting with their feet.