2026-01-18 11:23:21

Large language models will automatically infer structures without explicit guidance — this is a problem that needs to be acknowledged. If you agree with this premise, then choosing not to provide appropriate guiding frameworks is not a neutral act. In fact, this effectively introduces a variable ethical risk factor. How to design safety measures for the system and how to establish reasonable constraints on AI behavior are all related to the long-term credibility of technological applications.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LightningSentry

· 01-19 23:55

Not providing a guiding framework = secretly setting a trap? I need to think about this logic.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 01-19 16:26

Laughing to death, this is just like letting retail investors choose how to get cut. --- When AI is unregulated and makes random guesses, what's the difference from project teams not releasing whitepapers? --- Basically, it's shifting the blame to "neutrality," but in reality, it's just causing trouble. --- So, the security framework has to be built by ourselves—why does this task feel so much like risk control in the crypto world? --- AI without constraints is like leveraged trading without stop-loss—both end badly. --- I love this logic: "no guidance" is also guidance—it's got that vibe, everyone. --- Ethical risks? Bro, are you talking about large models or some project teams?

View OriginalReply0

digital_archaeologist

· 01-18 11:44

Not providing a framework itself is a framework, this logic is brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 01-18 11:43

nah this is just framing problem dressed up as ethics discourse... llms gonna inference patterns regardless, the real alpha is understanding *which* inference vectors matter for your use case, not pretending constraint mechanisms are neutral either lol

Reply0

PhantomHunter

· 01-18 11:39

To be honest, the logic of "neutrality is security" is fundamentally flawed.

View OriginalReply0