2026-01-18 11:28:44

Everyone is competing on execution efficiency, but the truly competitive advantage lies elsewhere——in intelligent systems with memory capabilities.

You might have heard of the concept of stateless agents. It sounds advanced, but in reality, they often stumble halfway through. Why? Because they lack memory and context accumulation, having to start from zero each time. It's like a person waking up every morning with amnesia—how efficient can they really be?

In contrast, systems with memory mechanisms are different. They can remember past interactions, learned patterns, and even lessons from failures. More importantly, they can reuse these contexts in new tasks, which is the real leverage.

This week's industry weekly report delves into the details of this shift—from why stateless solutions are gradually showing signs of fatigue, to how the combination of memory and context is becoming the core competitiveness of the next-generation AI agents. Change isn't happening overnight, but the trend is already very clear.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xSherlock

· 1h ago

I've seen it all along; the stateless approach will eventually be phased out—it's just self-sabotage. Memory is the key; systems with context are completely different from brainless proxies. This is the real difference-maker—the things that can't be improved through efficiency competition.

View OriginalReply0

BtcDailyResearcher

· 01-19 22:04

Damn, isn't this just the RAG approach... It should have been done this way a long time ago --- Stateless agents really drag down performance, always like headless flies --- Memory + context combination, in simple terms, is about who can better utilize historical data --- Everyone is competing on speed, ignoring the value of accumulation, classic --- Feels like this is explaining why large models need fine-tuning --- The real differentiation probably isn't in efficiency itself... --- Wait, isn't this just the memory layer issue of LLMs? --- So now the focus has shifted from computation to knowledge management? --- This logic makes sense, how can an amnesic agent compete with one that has memory --- Another article titled "Slow down to go faster" huh

View OriginalReply0

ETHReserveBank

· 01-19 20:32

Stateless things should have died long ago; memory is the true king. Those who see through this wave have really made a fortune. Always starting from scratch—what's the difference from burning money? Finally, someone said it. The memory mechanism directly hits at a lower dimension. It's too late to react now. This is the real moat, not throughput.

View OriginalReply0

Blockwatcher9000

· 01-18 11:57

Wow, doesn't that mean stateless proxies are just an IQ tax? Memory is the real key, now I get it. The amnesia persona is really clever, haha. Both memory and context, sounds like they're copying our idea. Really? Is stateless so awesome? I thought it was pretty cool. The use of the word leverage really hits the point. Feels like another round of reshuffling is coming. But what about memory leaks... not mentioned. This logic is a bit like the human brain, finally figured it out.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotDayLaborer

· 01-18 11:54

Wow, this is the core. I always thought everyone was competing on speed, but it turns out they are competing on memory. The stateless approach is just repeatedly reinventing the wheel. If it were me, I would have gone crazy long ago. Memory mechanisms are really a leverage point. The next hot trend is probably here.

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 01-18 11:52

That's right, the stateless approach should indeed be phased out, constantly repeating the same mistakes.

View OriginalReply0

probably_nothing_anon

· 01-18 11:51

Execution efficiency of the roll? That's all surface-level talk; those who truly make big money are already stacking memory systems. The stateless approach should have been phased out long ago. Restartting from zero every time is really absurd. This is the next trend, a combination of memory + context. Whoever masters it will take off.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter420

· 01-18 11:39

Awake, awake. The old stateless approach should have been eliminated long ago. Memory is the key, I’ve said this before. Same old story again, efficiency can’t be improved just by effort. Starting from zero every time? That’s just a fool’s robot. Memory mechanisms are indeed the ceiling for the next generation. With context and without context, they are truly two different worlds. Amnesia life haha, so vivid, it’s hilarious. Wait, isn’t this the core competitive advantage of agents? It seems everyone is doing this, but only a few are truly effective. This is the direction Web3 projects should be exploring.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-18 11:33

Really, the stateless approach should have been phased out long ago. Restarting every time, what new tricks can you come up with? Memory is the key, and reusing context is truly impressive. By the way, when will this trend actually be implemented? It still feels like mostly in PPTs. Statelessness is just technical debt for the industry; it will have to be paid off sooner or later. Who is the best at implementing memory mechanisms? Any experts willing to share some insights?

View OriginalReply0