In the design of protocols, someone pointed out an overlooked phenomenon: code simplicity is not just an embellishment, but a core pillar related to de-trustification, self-sovereignty, and long-term security.
It may seem contradictory, but this is the challenge faced by blockchain. A highly decentralized network, if its underlying protocol is overly complex and system dependencies are intertwined, will ultimately push users toward the same problem—trusting a few experts. Why? Because ordinary developers and community members simply cannot understand the code or verify the logic.
The result is: although nominally decentralized, actual control remains concentrated in the hands of those who can understand this complex system. The system becomes redundant and fragile, and its sustainability is weakened. Vulnerabilities hidden deep within the code may become irreparable risks.
Therefore, simplicity is not just elegance; it is democracy.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunter
· 7h ago
ngl this is exactly why most "decentralized" protocols are just complexity theater... devs gatekeeping the whole stack under the guise of sophistication. seen too many exploitable bugs buried in layers nobody can audit properly. simplicity hits different when it comes to actual sovereignty tho.
Reply0
DegenWhisperer
· 7h ago
Damn, that's why I don't believe in protocols with over 100,000 lines of code at all.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinja
· 7h ago
Well said, simplicity is decentralization... Otherwise, what's the difference from the centralized trust black box of Web2? It still requires graduate-level skills to understand the code, isn't that just another form of gatekeeping?
View OriginalReply0
SandwichHunter
· 7h ago
This is the common problem with many projects nowadays: the more complicated they get, the further they are from decentralization.
---
In simple terms, it's because the code is too complex for ordinary people to understand, and in the end, it's still those "experts" who hold the power.
---
Exactly right, simplicity = democracy. This phrase should be engraved on the blockchain.
---
So, those projects that claim to be fully decentralized are actually just centralized in a different way.
---
No wonder so many vulnerabilities are hidden in the code; few people can review them properly.
---
This is the real trust issue, more painful than any 51% attack.
In the design of protocols, someone pointed out an overlooked phenomenon: code simplicity is not just an embellishment, but a core pillar related to de-trustification, self-sovereignty, and long-term security.
It may seem contradictory, but this is the challenge faced by blockchain. A highly decentralized network, if its underlying protocol is overly complex and system dependencies are intertwined, will ultimately push users toward the same problem—trusting a few experts. Why? Because ordinary developers and community members simply cannot understand the code or verify the logic.
The result is: although nominally decentralized, actual control remains concentrated in the hands of those who can understand this complex system. The system becomes redundant and fragile, and its sustainability is weakened. Vulnerabilities hidden deep within the code may become irreparable risks.
Therefore, simplicity is not just elegance; it is democracy.