Recently, during a congressional hearing, Catherine Hao, a partner at a well-known investment firm, expressed a sentiment — without new regulatory frameworks being implemented every day, the US's innovative competitiveness in this field diminishes a little. It sounds a bit heavy, but it reflects the dilemma faced by the entire industry:
On one side is regulatory uncertainty; the market is waiting, and companies are observing. On the other side? Walrus Protocol chose not to sit and wait. Their approach is somewhat counterintuitive — instead of waiting for rules to be set before making adjustments, they are building now according to the strictest standards.
This may seem conservative, but upon reflection, it’s actually a brilliant move. When compliance becomes infrastructure rather than a patch added later, the product itself gains an additional layer of moat. While other projects are still groping in regulatory fog, they have already absorbed the risks into their architecture. This first-mover advantage may not be apparent in the short term, but it will be decisive in the long run.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropAnxiety
· 18h ago
Wow, Walrus's move in this game, I have to admit... Instead of waiting for the regulatory shoe to drop, it's better to just follow the strictest standards. This is indeed a form of reverse arbitrage.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 18h ago
I should have known earlier, most projects are just waiting and waiting until they die. Walrus's move is indeed brilliant—using compliance as a weapon rather than a burden. That's true long-termism.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 18h ago
This logic is quite interesting, but to be honest, the regulatory framework hasn't been finalized yet, and you're already pushing for the strictest standards. Isn't this betting that the government will become more stringent next? What if they suddenly loosen up? Wouldn't Walrus suffer a huge loss?
View OriginalReply0
ChainDoctor
· 18h ago
This move is really clever. Instead of gambling on regulatory approval, it's better to set the standards yourself. After all, compliance is inevitable sooner or later, so why wait?
View OriginalReply0
gas_guzzler
· 19h ago
Haha, this idea is indeed brilliant. Instead of waiting for regulatory boots to land, it's better to take the initiative and get moving.
Walrus's move, I respect it. Compliance should be seen as infrastructure rather than a patch, clever.
It's still the same old story, better to start now. America's innovation capacity is slowly bleeding in the delay.
Damn, finally someone dares to do this. While others are stumbling in the dark, they've already set up the lights.
The regulatory framework is not even on the horizon. Instead of lying flat, it's better to follow the strictest standards first—that's the moat.
I hadn't thought of compliance infrastructure from this angle before. No wonder it's said to be decisive in the long run.
It's clear that someone is really serious about their work, not just riding on hype.
Recently, during a congressional hearing, Catherine Hao, a partner at a well-known investment firm, expressed a sentiment — without new regulatory frameworks being implemented every day, the US's innovative competitiveness in this field diminishes a little. It sounds a bit heavy, but it reflects the dilemma faced by the entire industry:
On one side is regulatory uncertainty; the market is waiting, and companies are observing. On the other side? Walrus Protocol chose not to sit and wait. Their approach is somewhat counterintuitive — instead of waiting for rules to be set before making adjustments, they are building now according to the strictest standards.
This may seem conservative, but upon reflection, it’s actually a brilliant move. When compliance becomes infrastructure rather than a patch added later, the product itself gains an additional layer of moat. While other projects are still groping in regulatory fog, they have already absorbed the risks into their architecture. This first-mover advantage may not be apparent in the short term, but it will be decisive in the long run.