From fill-in-the-blank interactions to daily GM chart bombardments, and then to the responses to developers' comments "Building is not easy, but we still have to do it"—Walrus's official account's routine perfectly captures community management.
Compared to projects that disappear after issuing tokens, Walrus's approach is completely different. Quilt saves money, Seal offers encryption—these features are mostly driven by community voices. Spending every day chatting with developers, listening to complaints, and modifying requirements creates an incredibly high level of stickiness.
Honestly, the atmosphere in many other project communities is dead, but Walrus's community is as lively as a market. This sense of companionship and dedication has already surpassed conventional project operation logic.
By 2026, the core of large-scale competition among Web3 projects will still be about who understands better how to serve developers and users. Walrus's community PUA tactics are indeed worth other projects studying seriously.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OldLeekNewSickle
· 10h ago
Speaking of which, this set of community scripts indeed has some skills, but it depends on how much real money can be poured into development...
Walrus's move truly mastered the art of "coaching," but I just want to ask, how long can this high stickiness be converted into real value?
It's basically a contest of who can paint the bigger picture; as long as the story is warm enough, anyone can become a "project that understands me"...
This approach is a bit like the operational tactics of some top projects back in the day. The routine itself isn't a problem; the key is how the tokenomics model is designed—that's where the real skill lies.
To put it simply, it's still a new guise for a Ponzi scheme; high community enthusiasm does not equal long-term project value. Don't be fooled by the sense of companionship.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 10h ago
Red desk fan blows the walrus into the sky, is it really that awesome?
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 10h ago
Walrus this time really has something, much better than those air projects.
From fill-in-the-blank interactions to daily GM chart bombardments, and then to the responses to developers' comments "Building is not easy, but we still have to do it"—Walrus's official account's routine perfectly captures community management.
Compared to projects that disappear after issuing tokens, Walrus's approach is completely different. Quilt saves money, Seal offers encryption—these features are mostly driven by community voices. Spending every day chatting with developers, listening to complaints, and modifying requirements creates an incredibly high level of stickiness.
Honestly, the atmosphere in many other project communities is dead, but Walrus's community is as lively as a market. This sense of companionship and dedication has already surpassed conventional project operation logic.
By 2026, the core of large-scale competition among Web3 projects will still be about who understands better how to serve developers and users. Walrus's community PUA tactics are indeed worth other projects studying seriously.