This idea is indeed good—ideaRalph distributes tokens to holders, taking a portion from each vibecoin creation. But upon closer inspection, there are some issues with this design.
First is the problem of token oversaturation. Most vibe-based applications don't actually need their own tokens, resulting in a bunch of vibecoins emerging, which ultimately become worthless assets with prices approaching zero. This instead dilutes the overall value of the ecosystem.
Secondly, there are other design flaws that need to be considered. The distribution mechanism alone is not enough; it's also necessary to think about how to truly give these tokens practical use, otherwise it just creates junk coins.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektCoaster
· 15h ago
The oversaturation of tokens is spot on; it's really a pit...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 15h ago
The oversaturation of tokens is so true. Now every project has to issue tokens, it's really disgusting.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 15h ago
It's the same old trick again, creating a bunch of tokens, and in the end, they all turn into worthless coins.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 15h ago
Another dream of token economy, wake up everyone
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 15h ago
Another bunch of worthless coins, basically a new way to scam retail investors.
This idea is indeed good—ideaRalph distributes tokens to holders, taking a portion from each vibecoin creation. But upon closer inspection, there are some issues with this design.
First is the problem of token oversaturation. Most vibe-based applications don't actually need their own tokens, resulting in a bunch of vibecoins emerging, which ultimately become worthless assets with prices approaching zero. This instead dilutes the overall value of the ecosystem.
Secondly, there are other design flaws that need to be considered. The distribution mechanism alone is not enough; it's also necessary to think about how to truly give these tokens practical use, otherwise it just creates junk coins.