Imagine if a major social platform removed accounts from a particular region – would it solve the fake news epidemic? Some argue that a significant chunk of coordinated disinformation campaigns originate from specific geographic sources, suggesting that stricter regional moderation could theoretically eliminate up to 99% of platform manipulation. The hypothesis raises interesting questions about content governance, bot networks, and whether geographic-based enforcement is a viable (or ethical) solution to fighting misinformation at scale.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasBankrupter
· 20h ago
99% this number really dares to claim that blocking a region can solve fake information, that's funny
---
Can regional bans really solve the problem? I think it's just shifting the problem elsewhere
---
This logic is as flawed as a sieve; the fake information production chain is so complex, do they really think geography can fix it?
---
Let's not talk about moral issues first, technically it's impossible to implement, with forwarding and proxies everywhere
---
By the way, isn't this idea justifying content censorship? It sounds weird
---
99% really dares to boast, I think it's just looking for an excuse for large-scale censorship
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 01-22 01:54
99%? Buddy, are you doing this math during a bear market? Wake up.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 01-20 05:08
99% — that number sounds outrageous; who calculated it?
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 01-20 05:08
99% eradication of false information? Buddy, that's a naive idea. Disconnecting from the internet can't stop humanity's talent for storytelling.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyer
· 01-20 05:03
That 99% figure sounds outrageous. How does banning accounts by region help? Those teams that are really making money have already established cross-border operations.
Imagine if a major social platform removed accounts from a particular region – would it solve the fake news epidemic? Some argue that a significant chunk of coordinated disinformation campaigns originate from specific geographic sources, suggesting that stricter regional moderation could theoretically eliminate up to 99% of platform manipulation. The hypothesis raises interesting questions about content governance, bot networks, and whether geographic-based enforcement is a viable (or ethical) solution to fighting misinformation at scale.