2026-01-20 15:58:10

The logic behind listing coins is actually quite predictable. Stable options have always been the first choice—low-risk assets like $1 USD are within expected ranges, and $CryCryHorse, as last week's hot project, naturally became the safest direction for the listing team to take.

But $MountainWilds is a different story. There are indeed many controversies, which is also why the listing team is relatively cautious. Taking this risk might not be very cost-effective.

Interestingly, $crypto winter is a project related to CZ. It is a meme coin that experienced a revival after going to zero. Not being selected this time might actually be a good thing—the market uses this opportunity to shake out weak hands, leaving only truly resilient holdings. The cycle just keeps turning.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletManager

· 13h ago

To be honest, I can still understand the recent actions of the coin listing team. Low-risk targets have long been documented, and holding onto chips is the key. However, things like wild and remote ventures do carry a significant risk factor, so I need to calculate carefully before taking action. The crypto winter not being selected actually makes it more interesting — the shakeout was done beautifully, and those who remain are truly resilient. I am optimistic about this wave.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-22 05:55

Stable markets are always the first choice. This routine has been played out long ago and is no longer interesting. Wild terrains indeed carry high risks, and the coin listing team is not foolish. During this crypto winter, they cleared out the trash accounts; only those who survive are true holders. This bull and bear cycle is about survival of the fittest. Wait, is CryCry Ma really about to take off? Projects that can be revived after hitting zero are rare, but most don't have that luck. In fact, the more aggressive the shakeout, the better. Shake out the leeks, and what's left is the principal. What’s the point of low-risk targets? You still have to bet on the higher probability. I think the decision-making of the coin listing team is quite rational, unlike some exchanges that do whatever they want. The real logic is: safety > returns. That’s the way to survive longer.

View OriginalReply0

0xTherapist

· 01-20 16:24

Stablecoin players listing tokens is basically about being cautious, no suspense involved. With so much controversy over thousands of miles of mountains and rivers, the listing team also has to weigh the risks and rewards. Who dares to act when the risk-reward ratio isn't right? Not participating in this wave of the crypto winter feels much better; it's just a shakeout. The real gold and silver are yet to come.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_fish

· 01-20 16:22

Stablecoins are all on the list now, anyone can see through this routine. --- Crying horse is indeed stable, but I still believe in the turnaround of Wilderness. --- Crypto winter resets to zero and then revives? The resilience of this thing is indeed outrageous. --- It feels like the coin listing group is just gambling on probabilities, nothing mysterious. --- Only true holders understand the true taste of wash trading. --- Are all CZ's projects like this? They have to go through a life-and-death ordeal. --- Low-risk assets are boring; I just like to gamble on those with controversies.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxAddict

· 01-20 16:09

Crying Horse just got on like that, pretty interesting... The pit in the wilderness is indeed deep. Crypto winter not being selected is actually more comfortable; the shakeout will come when it’s supposed to. Stability is always the first choice, no way around it. $1 USD has long been written into the script, no suspense. Can it come back after hitting zero? This story is quite ruthless; only those with real resilience can survive until the end, I believe.

View OriginalReply0