Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
🚀 WHY AREN'T GULF COUNTRIES "HITTING BACK" AT IRAN?
Many people have recently posed a rather interesting question: Iran continues to take provocative actions in the region, yet Gulf countries like the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, or even Saudi Arabia respond quite cautiously. They don't lack money or military power, so why don't they strike back forcefully?
The first reason is quite simple yet pragmatic: they are direct neighbors of Iran. The Gulf states understand very clearly that Iran sits just across the Persian Gulf, and relations between countries in the region, no matter how tense, ultimately must find ways to normalize. A UAE official once stated quite bluntly that when looking at reality, everyone is a neighbor, and relations with Tehran sooner or later must be adjusted for coexistence.
In other words, the US or Western powers can change their presence in the region over time, but Iran will always be there. If direct conflict were to occur, after the war these countries would still have to live next to each other, still have to share maritime routes and trade within the same sea region.
Furthermore, Iran is not an easy adversary to deal with. The country possesses a large arsenal of missiles and has a network of allied forces spread throughout the region. If war were to break out, major cities in the Gulf or oil and gas facilities, which are the lifeblood of their economies, could become primary targets. Even a brief conflict could destroy years of economic development.
For this reason, Gulf countries understand that stability is worth more than demonstrating military might. The UAE wants to become a global financial center. Saudi Arabia is pursuing its Vision 2030 economic reform program. Qatar is expanding investments worldwide. All these objectives require a stable regional environment.
Professor of History Bader Al Saif at Kuwait University once noted that countries in the region also see the reality: the US has withdrawn from Afghanistan, is reducing its presence in Iraq, and may continue to narrow its role in the future. This means Gulf states ultimately still have to find ways to coexist with Iran.
Therefore, rather than military responses, many countries are choosing to reduce tensions and maintain diplomatic channels. Some smaller countries in the region also tend to observe Saudi Arabia's stance, as it is the Gulf's largest power and their decisions often influence the direction of other nations.
In summary, the relative silence of Gulf countries is not a sign of weakness. It is a strategic choice. In the complex geopolitical context of the Middle East, sometimes the wisest approach is not to retaliate immediately, but to keep the region stable enough to continue existing and developing alongside neighbors that cannot be changed.