👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Ripple_s top legal comments on recently revealed Hinman_s speech
In a Twitter thread, chief legal officer at Ripple Stuart Alderoty sheds light on the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple. He reveals previously undisclosed information regarding Bill Hinman’s influential speech
Alderoty states that, after five years and seven court orders, the public can finally access emails and drafts related to Hinman’s speech, which offer a behind-the-scenes glimpse into the controversy.
Speaking at the Yahoo Finance All Markets Summit in 2018, Hinman provided guidance on how the SEC would regulate digital assets, includingbitcoinandethereum. He said, in particular, that digital assets should not be considered a security and, therefore, be subject to the regulatory framework for securities. For instance, Hinman mentioned that a sufficiently decentralized token is no longer considered security.
You might also like:
SEC emails show multiple officials examining ethereum in 2018 According to Alderoty, Hinman completely dismissed criticisms of his speech. He raised worry that the lengthy number of characteristics might lead to misunderstandings about how securities should be classified. In addition, Alderoty suggested that Hinman could make more explicit connections between his made-up elements and the well-established Howey analysis, but this was disregarded.
Moreover, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) concluded that one of Hinman’s criteria, keeping ownership or interest in a digital asset, was inappropriate under the law. Nevertheless, Hinman discussed it in his presentation.
There were also concerns that Hinman should have answered the fundamental issue of whether or not a digital asset satisfies the legal criteria of security, instead opting to discuss the advantages of SEC regulation. This omission drew attention to a loophole in the rules that Hinman had chosen to overlook.
Alderoty stresses that Hinman did not think there should be any rules regarding ethereum (ETH) as security. Fearing it might restrict the agency’s flexibility to adopt a different stance on ETH in the future, the OGC raised qualms about specifically referencing ETH in the speech. However, the use of ETH continued throughout the presentation.
Alderoty demands that the SEC immediately remove Hinman’s remarks after these disclosures. Despite the expected uncertainty, he urges that an in-depth study be conducted to learn more about the influences and conflicts that led to the SEC’s support of the speech.
Read more:
Ripple’s CEO sees release of Hinman documents as positive