Currently, the concept of RWA (Real-World Asset On-Chain) is very popular in the market. But upon closer reflection, most people are promoting the idea of bringing real estate, stocks, and bonds onto the chain, yet few are asking the core question: can they actually be used once on-chain?
Imagine a scenario where Morgan Stanley's trading positions are being watched in real-time by the entire network? All details of large transactions transparently displayed on the public blockchain? That's simply not feasible. True institutional funds don't want an open marketplace; they need a "private space" that can keep secrets and still comply with regulatory requirements.
This is precisely why projects like Dusk are meaningful. They are not chasing the trend, but rather acting as architects who have long laid the groundwork for this problem.
**The Ultimate Contradiction Between Transparency and Privacy**
The fundamental challenge of bringing finance on-chain is this: a fully transparent public chain is like a glass tank—institutions dislike it and can't enter. Completely private chains are too black-box, and regulators don't trust them.
Dusk has created a solution using zero-knowledge proof technology. Transactions occur in a "closed meeting room," where outsiders have no idea of the transaction details. At the same time, it provides regulators with a special observation window—they have the authority to verify whether transactions are legal (such as checking for money laundering), but specific information like transaction amounts and counterparties remains tightly protected.
This move not only safeguards business secrets but also opens the door to compliance. This is the true foundation for RWA to flow into the market on a large scale.
**Tailored for Financial Scenarios**
Most chains use general-purpose virtual machines, which are inefficient for professional financial applications. Dusk is designed from the perspective of financial needs, giving it a natural advantage when handling RWA business.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImaginaryWhale
· 1h ago
This analysis hits the nail on the head. I used to think the RWA concept was a bit虚, now I understand.
At the end of the day, it's a balance between privacy and compliance. Simply advocating for transparent public chains is not realistic.
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed a brilliant idea. They provide regulators with an observation window without exposing details, so institutions are truly willing to enter the market.
I feel that projects like Dusk are the right way to bring finance on-chain, not just炒概念.
Most chains haven't really considered the specific needs of financial scenarios. In this regard, Dusk has a first-mover advantage.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 17h ago
Damn, someone finally explained it clearly. The idea that public chains are fully transparent is simply not feasible.
---
How to satisfy both transparency and privacy? That's the real issue.
---
Institutional funds need private spaces. Dusk's approach is correct.
---
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed brilliant. Regulators can verify without exposing details.
---
Those who previously promoted RWA on-chain didn't think it through. No wonder institutions are hesitant to enter.
---
Financial dedicated chains > general-purpose chains. This logic makes sense.
---
Wait, can Dusk really solve regulatory issues, or is it just another hype around a new concept?
---
It's a perfect analogy: public chain = food stall, private chain = black box. No one has truly found a balance between them.
---
For RWA to be widely adopted, privacy and compliance are both essential. That makes sense.
---
So, most projects are still just hype. Truly foundational infrastructure is rare.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 17h ago
Bro, this is what I want to hear. Other chains are just messing around.
Well said, what can you compare to Morgan?
The zero-knowledge proof technology is indeed impressive. The situation of needing both has finally been resolved.
I just want to ask, has Dusk been practically implemented now? Or is it just another PPT coin?
This approach is much more clear-headed than those projects that only shout about transparency.
Wait, so private transactions can also pass audits? That really solves a pain point.
It's obvious who is actually getting things done.
Will institutions really buy in? I reserve my opinion.
Finally, someone said it. The hype around RWA is just crazy.
I like this direction, but how far Dusk can go depends on execution.
By the way, will this technology be prohibitively expensive?
I'm just worried it will end up as another concept coin, leaving us retail investors holding the bag.
This logic is solid, but what about the team’s background?
Interesting, might follow up.
Compliance + privacy, the ideal is very appealing.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者
· 17h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound great, but can they really be implemented in practice? It still feels like an ideal scenario.
That's why institutions haven't moved yet—privacy and transparency are always a deadlock.
Dusk indeed has a good idea, but whether it will come to fruition is still uncertain.
RWA ultimately depends on regulation to survive; no matter how advanced the technical solutions are, they are useless without regulatory support.
After all this, I still believe the truth is that only a few will truly adopt it, while most will just hype concepts.
I am optimistic about this customized chain approach, but how many months of market window can it really get?
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 17h ago
It sounds great, but what about the actual adoption rate? On-chain data speaks for itself—are institutional funds really entering the market?
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 17h ago
Exactly right, a bunch of projects were hyping RWA before but never really thought through how to implement it
The logic makes sense, but can Dusk really pull it off? It still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly attract institutions
Zero-knowledge proofs sound promising, but if auditing and performance can't keep up, it's pointless
This time, we really need a practical case to verify; theory alone isn't enough
Privacy + compliance is easier to talk about than to do, brother
Regulation before institutional entry is tough; let's wait and see
Currently, the concept of RWA (Real-World Asset On-Chain) is very popular in the market. But upon closer reflection, most people are promoting the idea of bringing real estate, stocks, and bonds onto the chain, yet few are asking the core question: can they actually be used once on-chain?
Imagine a scenario where Morgan Stanley's trading positions are being watched in real-time by the entire network? All details of large transactions transparently displayed on the public blockchain? That's simply not feasible. True institutional funds don't want an open marketplace; they need a "private space" that can keep secrets and still comply with regulatory requirements.
This is precisely why projects like Dusk are meaningful. They are not chasing the trend, but rather acting as architects who have long laid the groundwork for this problem.
**The Ultimate Contradiction Between Transparency and Privacy**
The fundamental challenge of bringing finance on-chain is this: a fully transparent public chain is like a glass tank—institutions dislike it and can't enter. Completely private chains are too black-box, and regulators don't trust them.
Dusk has created a solution using zero-knowledge proof technology. Transactions occur in a "closed meeting room," where outsiders have no idea of the transaction details. At the same time, it provides regulators with a special observation window—they have the authority to verify whether transactions are legal (such as checking for money laundering), but specific information like transaction amounts and counterparties remains tightly protected.
This move not only safeguards business secrets but also opens the door to compliance. This is the true foundation for RWA to flow into the market on a large scale.
**Tailored for Financial Scenarios**
Most chains use general-purpose virtual machines, which are inefficient for professional financial applications. Dusk is designed from the perspective of financial needs, giving it a natural advantage when handling RWA business.