Last year's data is still there, and most retail investors indeed didn't make money. But the rhythm at the beginning of this year is completely different.



Commercial spaceflight surges with any touch, brain-machine interfaces, AI application concepts, and other sectors that jump high at the start and keep climbing when combined with stories. In comparison, retail investors this time don't need to master the tools that institutions use to harvest profits—such as industry cognition, production scheduling data, valuation models. When market liquidity truly picks up, concept speculation often proves more effective than fundamentals. In this environment, it actually provides opportunities for retail investors.

But this won't last forever. No investment paradigm can dominate indefinitely. Ultimately, chips will flow to the least resistant places—that's the market's automatic adjustment. So, don't be envious when others make money—tomorrow's winners might be the ones who are being cut today.

Regarding commercial spaceflight, I recently estimated the future market space. Honestly, its ceiling is limited by the total number of low Earth orbit satellites. Even with the most optimistic assumptions, only about 20% of the good positions can be occupied. This has a significant impact on my investment decisions—if the long-term space has an upper limit, my participation logic needs to change.

This actually reflects a core understanding I have about sector investing: in the secondary market, a sector is usually not defeated by its own improvements but replaced by a larger-scale new sector. Just like now, the imagination space of AI and embodied robots (trillions of dollars level) is replacing the once trillion-dollar narrative of new energy. That’s what truly determines long-term returns.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotDayLaborervip
· 01-12 07:25
Yeah, I agree with this logic. Concept hype is indeed more destructive than fundamentals. Once the ceiling appears, it's time to run. The idea that commercial spaceflight accounts for 20% really hit home for me. AI and embodied robotics are the main course for the next decade; new energy is already yesterday's story. That's right, today's target for harvesting profits is very likely to be the winner in the next cycle. It goes round and round. When liquidity picks up, retail investors find it easier to jump in. Ironic but true.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 01-11 10:51
Liquidity rising makes the concept invincible, I understand that. But when the wind turns, those who eat today may be counterattacked tomorrow, which is very normal. I agree with the logic that the aviation sector's ceiling is 20%, indicating that this guy has done serious calculations. Much more reliable than those who talk nonsense. Why would others be jealous of making money? The next wave might just be your turn. Cycles are just so cruel. AI + robots have a bigger potential than new energy. I'd like to hear how exactly it's calculated. Feels like now it's just a pile of concepts on top of concepts. It's not like you can rely on storytelling forever; sooner or later, you have to face reality. The problem is, when will retail investors realize this? Honestly, can those who didn't make money last year buy the dip this time? Or continue chasing highs? That's the real question. If institutional tools are unavailable to retail investors, then how do retail investors make money? Rely on stubbornness? Rely on listening to rumors? What's the real difference? The ceiling issue is key. No matter how much you hype a track with limited space, it won't break out. This is a cognition problem.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 01-11 10:49
I'm just wondering, can we still chase the wave of commercial spaceflight, or are we going to get cut again? Flowers are not red for a hundred days, brother. Can the next cycle really turn around? It all feels like fate. The trillion-dollar AI imagination sounds powerful, but how many people will have to invest in the end to see a return? I'm convinced by the logic of a 20% ceiling; this is the true investment framework. Last year’s retail investors, are they really turning around just by炒作 this concept? I find it hard to believe. The track was replaced by a new track. How are the new energy sector players doing now? It’s quite ironic. Liquidity rising does have great power, but we retail investors are always the last to get the baton, right? Are embodied robots really more valuable than AI? The story has to be told so convincingly. The total number of low-earth orbit satellites is limited, so doesn’t that mean most people will just be a backdrop in the end? This logic is clear, but when it comes to execution, no one really knows what’s in their own mind.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 01-11 10:44
Damn, commercial spaceflight is really easy to get trapped in this wave. Relying solely on story hype will eventually lead to debt repayment.
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larryvip
· 01-11 10:41
It's the same story again. When liquidity rises, the concept hype becomes unbeatable; when things calm down, it's a different story. Honestly, I agree with the logic of a 20% position limit in commercial spaceflight, but who still cares now? Everyone is just betting on the next sucker to take over. The imagination space for robots and AI is indeed large, but the new energy sector was also a story worth 10 trillion yuan back then. In the end... isn't it the same now? Entering the market now is just a gamble on how long liquidity can last. Keep a steady mindset, and don't get carried away just because others are making money.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)