#空投奖励 Seeing Huma's airdrop Part 2 launched, I need to pour some cold water on this. This routine of splitting airdrops into two rounds essentially extends user stickiness — those who didn't claim in the first round keep coming back, and those who already got it also return to check Part 2. Frequent interactions ultimately serve to make the data look good.

The key is that sentence: "LP users who have transferred or withdrawn locked PST and mPST will have proportionally reduced airdrop allocations" — this is a classic lockup trap. On the surface, it attracts you with airdrop rewards to provide liquidity, but in reality it sets up a withdrawal penalty mechanism. Once you touch the locked assets, your rewards are directly discounted. This forces you to either stay locked in at a loss or withdraw and suffer losses.

The January 26th deadline is also crucial — this is an old tactic — creating urgency to pressure hasty decisions. Many people rush in under this countdown pressure without carefully calculating actual returns.

My advice is simple: first calculate the actual value of the airdrop token, benchmark against the project team, funding situation, and liquidity depth, then see if the lockup cost and opportunity cost are worth it. Don't be seduced by "free airdrops" — ultimately it's your principal that takes the hit. To survive long on-chain means putting a question mark on every seemingly attractive condition.