Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has issued a strategic warning to the blockchain industry regarding the transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC). As developers race to “future-proof” networks against the theoretical threat of quantum computers, Hoskinson argues that a hasty migration could inadvertently cripple existing blockchain performance.
The “Red Herring” of Immediate Quantum Threats
While the potential for quantum computers to break modern encryption is a serious academic concern, Hoskinson labeled the current level of panic as a “big red herring.” He suggests that the threat is not as imminent as many fear, noting that practical, cryptographically relevant quantum computers likely won’t emerge until the 2030s. By rushing to implement unoptimized security measures now, projects may be solving a future problem by creating an immediate operational crisis.
The Massive Performance Penalty
The primary hurdle for post-quantum adoption is the sheer weight of the new protocols. Current quantum-resistant algorithms are significantly less efficient than the Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) used by Bitcoin and Cardano today.
Hoskinson highlighted the steep trade-offs, stating, “The protocols to do that are about 10 times slower and 10 times more expensive to run.” He elaborated on the dilemma facing developers: “I have a thousand transactions a second. Now I’m going to do a hundred transactions a second, but I’m quantum proof. Nobody wants to be that guy.”
Strategic Patience and Hardware Alignment
Rather than a panic-driven hard fork, Hoskinson advocates for a measured approach that aligns with standardized guidance from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). He warned that moving before hardware manufacturers can provide specialized acceleration for these new standards could be a costly mistake. “If you pick a non-standard protocol… you’re 100 times slower than the hardware accelerated stuff,” he cautioned.
He pointed to DARPA’s Quantum Blockchain Initiative (QBI) as the key benchmark for the industry, suggesting that 2033 is the more realistic timeline for when these upgrades will actually be required.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Hoskinson Warns of 10x Performance Hit During Post-Quantum Transition
Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has issued a strategic warning to the blockchain industry regarding the transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC). As developers race to “future-proof” networks against the theoretical threat of quantum computers, Hoskinson argues that a hasty migration could inadvertently cripple existing blockchain performance.
The “Red Herring” of Immediate Quantum Threats
While the potential for quantum computers to break modern encryption is a serious academic concern, Hoskinson labeled the current level of panic as a “big red herring.” He suggests that the threat is not as imminent as many fear, noting that practical, cryptographically relevant quantum computers likely won’t emerge until the 2030s. By rushing to implement unoptimized security measures now, projects may be solving a future problem by creating an immediate operational crisis.
The Massive Performance Penalty
The primary hurdle for post-quantum adoption is the sheer weight of the new protocols. Current quantum-resistant algorithms are significantly less efficient than the Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) used by Bitcoin and Cardano today.
Hoskinson highlighted the steep trade-offs, stating, “The protocols to do that are about 10 times slower and 10 times more expensive to run.” He elaborated on the dilemma facing developers: “I have a thousand transactions a second. Now I’m going to do a hundred transactions a second, but I’m quantum proof. Nobody wants to be that guy.”
Strategic Patience and Hardware Alignment
Rather than a panic-driven hard fork, Hoskinson advocates for a measured approach that aligns with standardized guidance from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). He warned that moving before hardware manufacturers can provide specialized acceleration for these new standards could be a costly mistake. “If you pick a non-standard protocol… you’re 100 times slower than the hardware accelerated stuff,” he cautioned.
He pointed to DARPA’s Quantum Blockchain Initiative (QBI) as the key benchmark for the industry, suggesting that 2033 is the more realistic timeline for when these upgrades will actually be required.