Author: Go2Mars’s Web3 Research
First, clarify a concept: prediction markets are not gambling, but rather probability forecasts of upcoming events. They are a market mechanism based on trading the outcomes of future events. Essentially, they are tools that leverage collective intelligence to predict the likelihood of uncertain events. Participants express their views on event outcomes by buying and selling “contracts,” whose value ultimately depends on whether the event occurs or what the result is. The focus is on information aggregation and prediction accuracy.

In simple terms, prediction markets are like trading the “outcome of future events.” Participants are not buying stocks but are trading judgments on whether an event will happen or not. For example, for the event “2024 US Presidential Election, will Biden be elected?”, the market issues “Yes” and “No” contracts. The contract prices directly reflect the market consensus probability of the event: if the “Yes” contract is priced at $0.60, it indicates the market believes there is a 60% chance Biden will be elected.
Prediction markets typically use binary contracts (Yes/No), but can also be extended to multi-outcome events. Their advantage lies in encouraging participants to reveal truthful information through market incentives, thereby improving prediction accuracy.
Platforms like Polymarket adopt a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) model, similar to traditional centralized exchanges (such as stock markets). In this model, prices are no longer preset by algorithms but are driven in real-time by buy and sell limit orders submitted by participants. Market prices are determined by supply and demand, reflected in the matching of best bid and ask prices.

Recall what we mentioned earlier: contract prices reflect the market’s perceived probability of an event occurring. Yes, the order book model aligns perfectly with the concept of prediction markets. It allows market dynamics to adjust probability estimates. However, it’s important to note that the market price (probability) does not always perfectly reflect the true probability of the event. Influences such as FOMO emotions, independent information channels, or market makers can cause deviations. This creates arbitrage opportunities: identifying mispricings and buying the undervalued side.
Prediction markets present many arbitrage opportunities. Participants usually play two roles:
Below, specific arbitrage methods are introduced one by one. Note that all arbitrage involves risk and is affected by market sentiment, fees, and liquidity constraints.
3.1 Finding Value Discrepancies
Unlike traditional betting with fixed odds from a bookmaker, polymarket’s prices are determined in real-time by user supply and demand. Markets can be influenced by emotions, leading to distorted prices that reflect “probabilities.” By scanning numerous events and combining human judgment, one can identify when market prices deviate from true value, buying the undervalued side.
Note: Markets may not correct (if sentiment persists), or your probability estimate may be wrong. This is not risk-free.
3.2 On-Platform Arbitrage
Basic idea: For the same event, the sum of Yes and No contract prices should equal 1 (or, for multi-outcome events, the total should sum to 1). If deviations occur, arbitrage opportunities arise.
Fundamental concept: YES + NO ≠ 1, or multiple outcomes sum ≠ 1.
Caution: this strategy can be eroded by:

3.3 Cross-Platform Arbitrage
The same event may have different odds on different platforms (e.g., Polymarket vs. Kalshi). Suppose Platform A has higher odds for “Event occurs” (market bullish), and Platform B has higher odds for “Event does not occur” (market bearish). If both describe the same event, you can bet on both sides simultaneously.


By comparing real odds on Polymarket and Kalshi, we can create a table:
| Platform | Magic (ORL) | Spurs (SAS) |
| polymarket | 41% | 60% |
| Kalshi | 43% | 57% |
If you buy the Magic team winning on Platform B at 41¢ and buy the Spurs team winning on Platform A at 57¢, total cost = 41¢ + 57¢ = 98¢.
Caution: Fees, transfer costs, and settlement differences between platforms may erode profits. Ensure event definitions are consistent.
Prediction markets are filled with automated bots and professional market makers who leverage efficient algorithms and techniques to capture most profits. As ordinary participants, we should reflect: what is our competitive advantage when facing these mechanized processes? We cannot monitor all arbitrage opportunities with high-frequency scans, so we should rely more on subjective judgment.
AI-assisted tools combined with personal expertise in specific event domains will be key to standing out. This collaborative approach can effectively fill algorithmic blind spots and achieve differentiated profits.
Action recommendations:
Always remember: markets are unpredictable. Arbitrage requires rigorous risk management and continuous learning.
Related Articles
Polymarket Explores Funding Round at $20B Valuation Amid Traffic Surge
Polymarket predicts a 64% probability that the Backpack token's FDV will exceed $300 million on its first day of launch
CFTC Chair: Will Issue Regulatory Guidance for Prediction Markets to Establish Clear Rules for New Types of Event Contracts
US CFTC Chair: Will Issue Clear Guidance on Prediction Markets to Prevent Manipulation and Insider Trading
Utah HB243 Bill Defines Prediction Markets as Gambling, Kalshi Files Federal Lawsuit
Two high win-rate addresses invested $15,000, betting that the US-Iran ceasefire will not happen before May