Address Poisoning Scams Drain Millions as Crypto Attacks Surge

ETH0,34%

Crypto users lost tens of millions of dollars in January to address poisoning and signature phishing scams, as attackers exploited lower transaction costs and user inattention to steal funds at scale.

Scam Sniffer Warns of Spike in Address Poisoning Losses

Crypto wallet scams intensified in January, with address poisoning and signature phishing attacks driving significant losses, according to data from blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer.

In one of the most striking cases, a single victim lost $12.2 million after mistakenly copying a malicious address from their transaction history. The incident followed a similar address poisoning attack in December that resulted in roughly $50 million in losses.

Scam Sniffer reported that address poisoning remains one of the most reliable methods for draining large sums from crypto wallets. Attackers create addresses that match the first and last characters of a trusted wallet, while subtly altering the middle portion, making them difficult to spot at a glance.

Alongside address poisoning, signature phishing attacks also surged in January. Scam Sniffer estimates that $6.27 million was stolen from 4,741 victims through malicious signature requests, marking a 207% increase compared to December. Notably, just two wallets were responsible for 65% of all signature phishing-related losses during the month.

Unlike address poisoning, signature phishing relies on tricking users into signing harmful blockchain transactions, such as granting unlimited token approvals or authorizing fund transfers without realizing the consequences.

Analysts believe the recent rise in attack volume may be partly linked to Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade, rolled out in December. By reducing transaction costs, the upgrade made it cheaper for attackers to send large numbers of dust transactions, lowering the barrier to running address poisoning campaigns at scale.

Read more: SEC Sounds Alarm as Crypto Scammers Flood Group Chats With AI-Powered Cons

Security firms continue to urge users to double-check wallet addresses, avoid copying addresses from transaction histories, and carefully review signature requests before approving them, as these attack methods show no signs of slowing down.

FAQ 🚨

  • What is address poisoning in crypto?

Scammers send look-alike wallet addresses to trick users into copying the wrong one.

  • How much was lost to these scams in January?

Victims lost tens of millions, including a single $12.2 million address poisoning case.

  • Why did signature phishing spike sharply?

Attackers exploited user inattention, stealing $6.27 million via malicious signatures.

  • What’s driving the rise in these attacks now?

Lower transaction fees made large-scale scam campaigns cheaper and easier to run.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

CertiK Report: Cryptocurrency ATM Fraud Losses Reach $330 Million in 2025, AI Technology Escalates Criminal Sophistication

CertiK released a report showing that cryptocurrency ATM fraud losses in the United States reached $330 million in 2025, with a 33% increase. Fraud tactics are gradually escalating, with elderly people becoming the primary targets. AI-driven fraud has 4.5 times the profitability of traditional methods, and the threat from transnational criminal organizations continues to rise.

GateNews2h ago

China AI Industry Development Alliance Continuously Tracks OpenClaw Security Risks, Compiles Enterprise-Level Deployment Risk Management Guidelines

Gate News reports that on March 12, the China Artificial Intelligence Industry Development Alliance is continuously tracking the security risk dynamics of OpenClaw and compiling an enterprise-level OpenClaw deployment risk management guide.

GateNews3h ago

Tencent Launches OpenClaw Security Toolbox to Address Security Challenges of Lobster AI Agent

Tencent launched the OpenClaw Security Toolkit on March 12th to address security challenges brought by AI Agents, providing multi-layered protection for enterprises and users. The toolkit includes security solutions for cloud and personal computers, supporting environment isolation and monitoring of anomalous instructions.

GateNews3h ago

Bonk.fun Hack Exposes Solana Users to Wallet Drainer Attack

Security experts discovered malicious code on Bonk.fun that exposed users to potential wallet-draining attacks. However, security experts have expressed fears that users of decentralized sites remain

TheNewsCrypto5h ago

Solana-Based BONKfun Memecoin Launchpad Suffers Security Exploit

The BONKfun Memecoin launchpad on Solana faced a serious security breach when hackers compromised a team account, enabling a crypto drainer that affected users who approved fraudulent transfers. The incident has raised concerns about user safety and trust in the Solana ecosystem.

BlockChainReporter5h ago

GoPlus Scans ClawHub Ecosystem Top 100 Skills, 21% Exhibit Clear High-Risk Operations

GoPlus released a report on March 12 scanning 100 frequently downloaded skills in the ClawHub ecosystem for security. The results showed that 21% were blocked and 17% received warnings. The report recommends implementing manual confirmation mechanisms for high-risk skills to enhance security.

GateNews5h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments