On February 28, U.S. lawmakers from both parties jointly introduced the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” on February 26, aiming to clarify the legal responsibilities of blockchain developers and prevent open-source code authors from being mistakenly classified as remittance institutions. The proposal, led by Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren, focuses on amending Section 1960 of the U.S. Code to target custodians who control customer assets or execute transfers on behalf of users.
The bill suggests that, amid rising debates over whether “open-source software developers should bear remittance licensing responsibilities” and “legal risks for non-custodial blockchain developers,” clear exemptions should be provided for entities that only write or distribute code. The ongoing lawsuits related to Tornado Cash have further amplified industry concerns about “code as crime.” Ben Cline noted that long-term regulatory expansion blurs the line between malicious actors and technological innovators; Scott Fitzgerald also emphasized that innovators should not face undue law enforcement pressure for developing infrastructure.
Industry support has come from the Solana Institute and the Blockchain Association, which believe the bill will help establish a clear framework distinguishing “open-source developers from custodial financial intermediaries.” Meanwhile, discussions in Washington also include topics like the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act. The former, passed by the House in 2025 but with slowed progress, aims to clarify regulations, while the latter enhances stablecoin oversight without expanding developer responsibilities.
Analysts believe that if enacted, the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” will set a precedent for reshaping the U.S. crypto regulatory framework and defining blockchain developers’ compliance boundaries. Ongoing lobbying efforts continue, and the specific wording and scope of the Section 1960 amendments could be a key factor influencing U.S. crypto policy in 2026.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Bank–Crypto Clash Slows Senate Clarity Act Progress
Dispute over stablecoin reward programs between banks and crypto firms has slowed progress on the Senate Clarity Act.
Banks warn rewards could trigger deposit flight, while crypto advocates say evidence of major shifts is limited.
Lawmakers including Sens. Alsobrooks and Tillis are
CryptoFrontNews37m ago
Bitcoin Policy Institute calls for revising U.S. tax rules that currently treat all BTC payments as capital gains
Gate News reports that on March 13, the Bitcoin Policy Institute called for modifications to current U.S. tax rules. Under existing regulations, all payments made using BTC are treated as capital gains transactions, requiring the payment of corresponding taxes. The institute argues that this regulation limits the practical application of Bitcoin as a means of payment.
GateNews2h ago
The first list of "Stablecoin Licenses" in Hong Kong is about to be announced! Rumors suggest they will go to HSBC, Standard Chartered, and OSL.
Hong Kong's first batch of "Stablecoin Issuer License" list will be announced next week. The three main applicants are HSBC, Standard Chartered Bank, and virtual asset platform OSL. This licensing round may favor banks due to their capital strength and regulatory advantages, while OSL possesses rich practical experience. Although rumors suggest the main list is finalized, the actual situation may still change.
区块客2h ago
US Crypto Regulatory "Civil War" Ceasefire: SEC and CFTC's Decade-Long Power Struggle Reaches a Turning Point
The U.S. cryptocurrency industry has long faced regulatory confusion, primarily reflected in the determination of crypto asset classification and the division of regulatory authority. Divergences between the SEC and CFTC have created multiple regulatory challenges for enterprises. Recently, the two agencies signed a memorandum of understanding to begin coordinating efforts to resolve regulatory conflicts and promote the establishment of an adaptive regulatory framework, aimed at forming a comprehensive digital asset regulatory system. This marks a gradual clarification of rule-making in America's digital finance era.
PANews3h ago
SEC and CFTC Sign MOU to Align Crypto Oversight Rules
SEC and CFTC signed an MOU to coordinate crypto oversight and align regulatory frameworks across digital asset markets.
Agreement supports data sharing, joint enforcement coordination, and clearer guidance for crypto firms.
Initiative links to the Harmonization plan and CLARITY Act
CryptoFrontNews3h ago
