英國前首相波里斯·強森在《每日郵報》撰文批比特幣是「巨大龐氏騙局」，川普次子 Eric Trump、Michael Saylor 等加密社群人士隨即在 X 平台強力反擊。
（前情提要：彭博：美伊戰爭對比特幣衝擊有限、盤整在 6 萬到 7 萬鎂，Hyperliquid 合約成避險風向球）
（背景補充：川普次子Eric Trump：我自己「All in」比特幣！最有錢的家族、基金、500強都想要BTC）
本文目錄
Toggle
- Eric Trump：完全不同意
- Saylor：比特幣沒有發行人、沒有保證回報
- BTC 站上 7.1 萬美元
英國前首相波里斯·強森（Boris Johnson）近日在《每日郵報》發表文章，直言比特幣是「巨大的龐氏騙局」，並以個人聽到的故事佐證：牛津郡村莊的一位退休老人在嘗試提款時損失約 2 萬英鎊，疑似遭遇詐騙。
強森質疑，為何要信任由匿名的中本聰所創建、毫無機構背書的系統？他更反問：「如果他們解密了加密貨幣，我們找誰負責？」他認為比特幣不過是儲存在一系列電腦中的一串數字，遠不如黃金或收藏品有實際價值。
但我們知道，強森以退休老人的詐騙案作為比特幣有罪的佐證，本身即存在邏輯謬誤。詐騙者利用比特幣行騙，並不等同於比特幣本身是詐騙，猶如電話詐騙不等於電話是騙局。
真正需要警惕的是假冒比特幣投資的詐騙行為，而非比特幣協議本身的設計架構。
Eric Trump：完全不同意
強森的言論迅速在加密社群引爆反彈。身為 American Bitcoin Corp 共同創辦人暨策略長的川普次子 Eric Trump，就在 X 平台簡潔有力地回應了兩個字：「Totally disagree（完全不同意）」。
長期力挺比特幣的他，此前多次公開表示比特幣是這個時代最偉大的資產，甚至預言 BTC 將衝破百萬美元。
Totally disagree
— Eric Trump (@EricTrump) March 13, 2026
Saylor：比特幣沒有發行人、沒有保證回報
迅速反應的還有 Strategy 執行主席、全球最大企業比特幣持有者 Michael Saylor。他在以龐氏騙局的定義正面拆解強森的指控：
比特幣沒有發行人、沒有推廣者、沒有保證回報 — 它只是一個開放的、去中心化的貨幣網路，由程式碼和市場需求驅動。
Saylor 的回應點出龐氏騙局的結構性要件：承諾高回報、依賴新資金流入填補舊投資人獲利，但比特幣的設計哲學與此截然相反：固定總量 2,100 萬枚、無中央發行機構、程式碼完全開源、任何人都可自願參與或退出。
BTC 站上 7.1 萬美元
回到市場方面，比特幣今晨突破 7.1 萬美元，截至本文撰寫時報約 71,345 美元，單日漲幅約 0.5%。
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Pi Network Starts Second Migration: Here’s What You Must Do to Be Eligible
Pi Network has initiated second migrations, allowing Pioneers to transfer more Pi to Mainnet, enhancing wallet security with two-factor authentication. This update may positively impact Pi Coin's market price, currently just below $0.20.
CaptainAltcoin2h ago
Circle Minted $8 Billion USDC Since February 2026
Arkham's analysis reveals a significant increase in USDC minting by Circle, surpassing $8B and raising total supply above $78B. This trend highlights USDC's growing market trust and indicates potential long-term volatility compared to other cryptocurrencies.
BlockChainReporter4h ago
Top 100 tokens by market cap today - gainers and losers: PEPE up 17.61%, RIVER down 5.82%
On March 16, among the top 100 cryptocurrencies by market cap, Pepe had the largest gain at 17.61%; River had the largest decline at down 5.82%. The overall market showed significant divergence.
GateNews6h ago
Venus Protocol Suspected of $3.7M Flash-Loan Attack
Key Takeaways:
An alleged exploit on Venus Protocol enabled a wallet to borrow about $3.7 million in crypto assets on the illiquid $THE token as security.
The speech had taken out BTCB, CAKE and WBNB and was put into liquidation as collateral value declined.
It is estimated that there is
CryptoNinjas6h ago
Today's US cryptocurrency ETF net inflows: BTC 2227, ETH 11681, SOL 88561
Gate News Update: On March 16, according to Lookonchain monitoring, today's cryptocurrency ETF capital inflows in the United States are as follows: Bitcoin ETF net inflow of 2227 BTC, Ethereum ETF net inflow of 11681 ETH, Solana ETF net inflow of 88561 SOL.
GateNews6h ago
DeFi's Most Expensive One-Click Confirmation: $50 Million Evaporated On-Chain in an Instant
On March 12, an anonymous investor attempted to purchase AAVE on the Aave protocol using $50.43 million USDT but received only approximately $36,000 in tokens due to extreme slippage, resulting in a loss of nearly $50 million. The incident quickly sparked widespread discussion, raising controversies surrounding user responsibility and protocol design. Experts recommended preventing slippage risks through methods such as batch trading and limit orders. Meanwhile, MEV bots profited from the situation, triggering discussions about DeFi fairness. This incident serves as a reminder for users to carefully review warnings before trading to avoid repeating such mistakes.
PANews7h ago
