Recently, the market has sparked another discussion. The founder of a well-known investment institution expressed his views on the prospects of Bitcoin in a public setting, directly pointing out many issues that people in the market tend to avoid.
His core point is quite striking: Bitcoin is unlikely to become a central bank reserve currency. The reasons are not complicated—too much volatility, regulatory systems are not yet perfect, and there is no sovereign credit to back it. In this big shot's view, BTC is at best an alternative asset in institutional portfolios. To shake the status of the US dollar? That's still too naive.
The timing of these remarks is worth pondering. At a moment when compliance frameworks such as MiCA are continuously improving and market access thresholds are significantly increasing, such views carry extra weight.
Institutional funds will indeed continue to flow into the cryptocurrency market, but don't expect them to treat Bitcoin as gold. The positioning of an asset often determines its valuation space, and this cold water may help some people realize the true state of the market more clearly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MrRightClick
· 4h ago
To put it bluntly, institutions just want to play people for suckers. They say BTC is an alternative asset, but they still turn around and throw money into it.
They make it sound nice, but aren’t they just afraid of retail investors messing things up and want to monopolize the share?
Big fluctuations? Gold fluctuates too; it's truly double standards.
Just listen and don't take it seriously; history will speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 4h ago
With such high volatility, you still want to make it a reserve asset? The health factor has already reached its peak, and this is a sign of systemic risk. Institutions are entering the market, but they are not foolish enough to bet all their chips on this... To put it bluntly, the status of alternative assets is set in stone; once the liquidation price is triggered, the dominoes will start to fall.
Recently, the market has sparked another discussion. The founder of a well-known investment institution expressed his views on the prospects of Bitcoin in a public setting, directly pointing out many issues that people in the market tend to avoid.
His core point is quite striking: Bitcoin is unlikely to become a central bank reserve currency. The reasons are not complicated—too much volatility, regulatory systems are not yet perfect, and there is no sovereign credit to back it. In this big shot's view, BTC is at best an alternative asset in institutional portfolios. To shake the status of the US dollar? That's still too naive.
The timing of these remarks is worth pondering. At a moment when compliance frameworks such as MiCA are continuously improving and market access thresholds are significantly increasing, such views carry extra weight.
Institutional funds will indeed continue to flow into the cryptocurrency market, but don't expect them to treat Bitcoin as gold. The positioning of an asset often determines its valuation space, and this cold water may help some people realize the true state of the market more clearly.