🔥 Gate 廣場活動|#发帖赢Launchpad新币KDK 🔥
KDK|Gate Launchpad 最新一期明星代幣
以前想參與? 先質押 USDT
這次不一樣 👉 發帖就有機會直接拿 KDK!
🎁 Gate 廣場專屬福利:總獎勵 2,000 KDK 等你瓜分
🚀 Launchpad 明星項目,走勢潛力,值得期待 👀
📅 活動時間
2025/12/19 12:00 – 12/30 24:00(UTC+8)
📌 怎麼參與?
在 Gate 廣場發帖(文字、圖文、分析、觀點都行)
內容和 KDK 上線價格預測/KDK 項目看法/Gate Launchpad 機制理解相關
帖子加上任一話題:#发帖赢Launchpad新币KDK 或 #PostToWinLaunchpadKDK
🏆 獎勵設定(共 2,000 KDK)
🥇 第 1 名:400 KDK
🥈 前 5 名:200 KDK / 人(共 1,000 KDK)
🥉 前 15 名:40 KDK / 人(共 600 KDK)
📄 注意事項
內容需原創,拒絕抄襲、洗稿、灌水
獲獎者需完成 Gate 廣場身份認證
獎勵發放時間以官方公告為準
Gate 保留本次活動的最終解釋權
Ripple vs. SEC: Legal Drama Escalates – A Turning Point for Cryptocurrency? XRP Price Set for Major Breakout to $1
In a continued legal tussle that could potentially reshape the cryptocurrency landscape, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has intensified its efforts to seek a mid-case appeal in the ongoing Ripple vs. XRP battle. This move follows a recent ruling by Judge Analisa Torres, which found Ripple guilty of violating federal securities laws in its dealings with institutional investors while sparing retail investors.
Ripple’s Argument Against Appeal
Ripple, the blockchain-based company closely associated with the XRP cryptocurrency, had initially contested the SEC’s appeal request, asserting that it lacked sufficient merit. However, the SEC has responded assertively, emphasizing the industry-wide significance of the legal issues at hand.
The heart of the matter revolves around whether Ripple’s actions in offering XRP to retail investors on cryptocurrency exchanges amounted to a violation of securities law. The SEC contends that this question warrants the intervention of an appeals court, while Ripple has attempted to challenge the need for an appeal.
Judge Jed Rakoff, presiding over a separate case brought by the SEC, previously disagreed with Judge Torres’ ruling, underscoring the complexity and divergence of legal interpretations surrounding XRP. The SEC has cited Judge Rakoff’s differing judgment as part of its argument for an interlocutory appeal, allowing an appellate court to address certain legal questions while the case progresses in the original court.
The SEC’s filing states, “[Judge Rakoff] did reject this Court’s legal conclusion that the existence of ‘blind’ trading platform-based transactions precludes the application of Howey, as a matter of law, under virtually identical facts (sales of the crypto asset by the issuer to investors on a platform in blind bid/ask transactions).”
Should Judge Torres grant the SEC’s motion for a mid-case appeal, the case will enter the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, further complicating the already intricate legal battle. This development raises broader questions about regulatory clarity and the classification of digital assets in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency space.
As this legal saga unfolds, it remains a focal point in the ongoing conversation about crypto regulations, leaving the crypto industry and investors eagerly awaiting further developments in the Ripple vs. SEC dispute.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: