Migrating Bitcoin to post-quantum may ‘easily’ take 5-10 years: Crypto exec

Cointelegraph
BTC4,11%

Migrating Bitcoin (BTC) to post-quantum standards will take at least 5-10 years, according to Bitcoin core developer and co-founder of crypto custody company Casa, Jameson Lopp, who weighed in on the ongoing quantum computer debate.

Lopp agreed with Adam Back, the CEO of crypto infrastructure company Blockstream, that there is no near-term threat to Bitcoin from quantum computers. Lopp said in an X post.

“Quantum computers won’t break Bitcoin in the near future. We’ll keep observing their evolution. Yet, making thoughtful changes to the protocol and an unprecedented migration of funds could easily take 5 to 10 years.

![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-d58f8ed127-8471e85b27-153d09-6d5686)

_Source: _Jameson Lopp

We should hope for the best, but prepare for the worst,” he added. In a separate post, he said the Bitcoin protocol is more challenging to upgrade to post-quantum standards than centralized software because of its distributed consensus model.

The debate over the quantum threat and possible solutions continues to be a major topic of discussion in the Bitcoin community, with a growing schism between Bitcoin maximalists, who urge caution in prompting changes to the protocol, and venture capitalists (VCs), who say the quantum threat is imminent.

**Related: **__Blockchains quietly prepare for quantum threat as Bitcoin debates timeline

Bitcoin OGs, developers and whales clash with venture capitalists

“Quantum-resistance solutions are affordable enough to be financed by non-profits and VCs,” Bitcoin maximalist Pierre Rochard said.

Rochard added that it would be so expensive to attack Bitcoin through quantum computers that the government would be forced to “subsidize it as a collective action problem.”

![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-16c3cbe0c9-50b1e81ad8-153d09-6d5686)

_Source: _Pierre Rochard

Samson Mow, a Bitcoin investor and CEO of wallet company and advocacy group JAN3, also cast doubt on the ability of a quantum computer to crack Bitcoin’s security.

“In reality, quantum computers can’t factor the number 21 — not 21 million — 21, without heavy customization to the algorithm,” Mow said.

Despite this, venture capitalists and other investment firms warn that BTC’s price is being impacted by the threat, or perceived threat, from quantum computers.

The price of BTC could dip below $50,000 if the protocol is not quantum-ready by 2028, according to Charles Edwards, the founder of digital asset investment fund Capriole.

Edwards called for Bitcoin node operators to enforce Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 360, which introduces a quantum-ready signature scheme for BTC.

**Magazine: **__Quantum attacking Bitcoin would be a waste of time: Kevin O’Leary

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Slippage: The Most Underestimated Profit Killer in Trading

Author: CryptoPunk Many crypto traders have experienced the same disappointment: strategies that appear stable and profitable in backtests quickly see their returns shrink when actually deployed, sometimes turning from profit into loss. The issue is often not "misjudging the direction," but underestimating trading costs, especially slippage. In crypto markets where bull and bear phases switch more rapidly, volatility is more intense, and order books are more fragmented, slippage is not a trivial decimal point—it is the real threshold that determines whether a strategy can survive. A deviation of just 2 or 3 basis points can, in high-turnover strategies, completely wipe out the theoretical alpha. Based on long-term backtests of BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT, this article aims to answer a very practical question: to what extent does slippage erode strategy returns, and which strategies are most likely to be killed by slippage? 1. Introduction: Why Slippage

PANews3m ago

Yesterday, Bitcoin spot ETF net inflows amounted to $199 million, with BlackRock's IBIT inflows of $139 million.

On March 16, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded total net inflows of $199 million, with BlackRock's IBIT leading at $139 million in inflows, Fidelity's FBTC at $64.53 million, while Ark's ARKB and VanEck's HODL saw outflows of $3.07 million and $6.28 million respectively.

GateNews15m ago

10x Research: Bitcoin's Current Rally May Be Driven by Massive Bearish Options Unwinding

Bitcoin's rise was primarily driven by put option sellers at the $55,000 and $60,000 levels, with traders closing positions forcing market makers to buy Bitcoin. The rally lacked bullish call buying, though Bitcoin broke through $76,000 today, pushing the crypto market higher.

GateNews17m ago

"Stop shorting Bitcoin", analyst calls as new price targets emerge

Thạch Sanh

TapChiBitcoin22m ago

Bitcoin Holds Steady at $75,000: Macro Data and Fed Decision Approach Present Critical Test for Market

On March 16th, Bitcoin's price rose to $75,300, demonstrating resilience amid heightened global macroeconomic uncertainty. At this time, the market is reassessing asset allocation and discussing Bitcoin's potential as a safe-haven asset. Upcoming U.S. economic data releases will influence its near-term trajectory, with institutional perspectives indicating that Bitcoin may benefit from geopolitical risks.

GateNews24m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments